fighting regulations

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "fighting regulations" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where individuals or groups are actively opposing or contesting specific rules or laws. Example: "The activists are fighting regulations that they believe unfairly restrict their rights."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

Much of this is due to a long history of corporations fighting regulations, for instance against acid rain and chlorofluorocarbons.

The Guardian

She is also fighting regulations requiring military women to be accompanied by men and to ride in the back seats of cars when off base in Saudi Arabia.

The New York Times

However it is unclear on its commitment to existing clients that have been involved in spreading doubt about climate change and fighting regulations to cut carbon pollution.

The Guardian

He also declined to say whether Edelman had let go or "scrubbed" clients – such as API and Alec that have been involved in spreading doubt about climate change and fighting regulations to cut carbon pollution.

The Guardian

In the coming years many of Mr Cameron's own MPs will press him to make good his veto by fighting regulations from Brussels, repatriating powers to Britain and resisting attempts by the new grouping to use institutions designed for the whole EU, such as the European Commission and the Court of Justice.

The Economist

And fighting regulations introduces another piece of friction to growing a startup, Hegarty says.

TechCrunch

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

49 human-written examples

Bankers are in the trenches all day, fighting regulation.

The New York Times

The book provided soundbites and ready-made talking points to arm any industry fighting regulation.

The Guardian

Tobacco lobbyists spent years fighting regulation by claiming to be defending individual freedom, not the profits of tobacco companies.

The New York Times

Rather than embracing the F.C.C.'s alerts-only proposal as a less costly solution than one that would suspend service, the wireless industry is fighting regulation of any kind.

The New York Times

And his book also reminds us that these banks are fighting tooth and nail to make sure the game stays as rigged as possible, fighting regulation of opaque derivatives and prohibitions on proprietary trading.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "fighting regulations", ensure the context clearly indicates which specific regulations are being opposed and the reasons for the opposition. This adds clarity and strengthens your argument.

Common error

Avoid using "fighting regulations" without specifying the type or purpose of the regulations being contested. Vague statements can weaken your message and lead to misinterpretations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "fighting regulations" functions primarily as a verbal phrase that describes an action being taken against established rules or laws. Ludwig provides examples in news and business contexts, indicating its role in describing opposition to existing regulations.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

85%

Formal & Business

10%

Science

5%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "fighting regulations" is a common expression used to describe active opposition to established rules or laws. Ludwig AI validates that this phrase is grammatically correct and usable, predominantly appearing in news and business contexts. It serves to convey resistance or challenge to specific regulatory measures, and while the phrase itself is generally neutral, its specific connotations depend on the context in which it's used. When employing this phrase, ensure you explicitly define which regulations are being contested to enhance clarity and avoid overgeneralization.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

opposing regulations

Focuses on the act of disagreeing with and resisting regulations.

challenging regulations

Emphasizes questioning and disputing the validity or effectiveness of regulations.

resisting regulations

Highlights the act of standing against or preventing regulations from taking effect.

combating regulations

Implies a more active and vigorous effort to defeat or overcome regulations.

contesting regulations

Suggests formally disputing regulations, often through legal or administrative means.

battling regulations

Conveys a sense of struggle and intense opposition to regulations.

campaigning against regulations

Describes organized and sustained efforts to oppose regulations.

lobbying against regulations

Refers to influencing policymakers to oppose or change regulations.

seeking deregulation

Highlights the goal of removing or reducing regulations.

pushing back against regulations

Implies an effort to counteract or reverse the effects of regulations.

FAQs

What does "fighting regulations" mean?

The phrase "fighting regulations" means actively opposing, challenging, or resisting rules and laws imposed by governing bodies. This can involve legal action, lobbying, public campaigns, or other forms of advocacy.

What are some alternatives to "fighting regulations"?

You can use alternatives like "opposing regulations", "challenging regulations", or "resisting regulations" depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use the phrase "fighting regulations"?

The phrase "fighting regulations" is appropriate in contexts discussing business, politics, environmental issues, or social activism where there is active opposition to specific rules or laws. It's often used in news reports, academic papers, and advocacy materials.

What is the difference between "fighting regulations" and "seeking deregulation"?

"Fighting regulations" describes the act of opposing existing rules, whereas "seeking deregulation" refers to the active pursuit of removing or reducing the scope of existing regulations altogether. The former is reactive, while the latter is proactive in dismantling regulatory frameworks.