Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

fewer crowd

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "fewer crowd" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct term would be "fewer people" or "smaller crowd" when referring to a reduced number of individuals in a gathering. Example: "The event was a success, but we had a fewer crowd than expected due to the rain."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

The pictures that do, though fewer, crowd out the rest by the size of the reaction they create.

"There should be many fewer crowd disasters given what we now know and can simulate," says Mr Helbing.The biggest test possible of these tools and techniques is the haj, the annual pilgrimage to Mecca in Saudi Arabia that Muslims are expected to carry out at least once in their lives if they can.

News & Media

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Letters are welcome via e-mail to [email protected] to choose a judgeSIR – You are correct in pointing out that the authority of international courts and tribunals depends ultimately on the quality of their judges ("Wanted: better judgment, fewer crowd-pleasers and lickspittles", November 22nd).

News & Media

The Economist

"Douglas Alexander, the party's election chief, said: 'Labour can win the general election if we take the right steps between now and a year's time.' "The 'if' has to include fewer crowd-pleasing cost-of-living promises and more counter-intuitive policies".

News & Media

The Guardian

"There are fewer crowds, and there's lots to do".

For fewer crowds, try Frying Pan off the backside.

More fun, fewer crowds and for less money?

Not to mention that fewer crowds mean more mountain all to yourself.

More walking means fewer crowds on the subway, and potentially more patrons in neighborhood businesses.

News & Media

The New York Times

For even fewer crowds, go to Sapodilla Bay on the island's southern tip.

-- Anne Zachos, Manchester, N.H. A. Spring is usually a wonderful time to visit Crete, with fewer crowds and typically glorious weather.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to a gathering of people, use "smaller crowd" or "fewer people" instead of "fewer crowd" to ensure grammatical correctness.

Common error

Avoid using "fewer" with nouns that represent a collective or uncountable entity like "crowd". "Fewer" is appropriate for countable items, while "less" or "smaller" is suitable for uncountable or collective nouns.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "fewer crowd" attempts to function as an adjective-noun combination, aiming to describe the size of a gathering. However, it's grammatically flawed because "fewer" is intended for countable nouns, and "crowd", although composed of individuals, acts as a collective noun. Ludwig AI identifies the phrase as incorrect.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "fewer crowd" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. As Ludwig AI points out, "fewer" is meant to be used with countable nouns, whereas "crowd" functions as a collective noun. Therefore, it's more appropriate to use ""smaller crowd"" or ""fewer people"" to accurately convey the intended meaning. Although the phrase appears in some news media, its usage should be avoided in formal writing. Use ""smaller crowd"", "less crowded", or ""fewer people"".

FAQs

How can I correctly use the words "fewer" and "crowd" together?

The correct way to express a smaller group of people is to say "smaller crowd" or "fewer people". For example, "There was a "smaller crowd" this year" or "There were "fewer people" at the event".

What's a better alternative to saying "fewer crowd"?

Instead of "fewer crowd", you could say ""smaller crowd"", "less crowded", or ""fewer people"". The choice depends on whether you want to describe the crowd itself or the number of individuals.

Is "fewer crowd" grammatically correct?

No, "fewer crowd" is not grammatically correct. "Fewer" is used for countable nouns, and while individuals are countable, "crowd" functions as a singular collective noun in this context. Therefore, it's better to use ""smaller crowd"" or rephrase to ""fewer people"".

When should I use "fewer" versus "less" when talking about people?

"Fewer" is used with countable nouns (things you can count individually), like "people", "attendees", or "visitors". "Less" is used with uncountable nouns, like "attendance" or "congestion". Therefore, use ""fewer people"" and "less congestion".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: