Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
few interaction
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "few interaction" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "few interactions"? You can use "few interactions" when referring to a small number of exchanges or communications between people or entities. Example: "Despite being in the same room, there were few interactions between the two colleagues throughout the meeting."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
9 human-written examples
XREPL makes the last few interaction results available for evaluation via special toplevel variables: ^, ^^,..., ^^^^^.
There were few interaction effects between concentrate and silage sources on daily intake and dairy performance.
Science
Few interaction effects were found to be significant.
Science
It implements a few interaction sites: The predicted MoRF region includes a site phosphorylated by Polo-like kinase (DDLTLHS, residues 393 399).
Science
In addition, important conditional dependencies may not be detected using Zhu et al.'s approach when only a few interaction effects exist.
A recent case report indicates an interaction between bilberry and warfarin that induces rectal bleeding [ 50], however, few interaction data are published on this herb.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
50 human-written examples
species with few interactions ('specialist' species) preferentially interact with species with many interactions ('generalist' species)— and a dense core of interactions created by symmetric interactions between generalist species.
Science
Few interactions among factors were detected.
These contain few interactions and are extremely predictable.
News & Media
But we had very few interactions with people, no romance or anything like that.
News & Media
Donors to the two parties had very few interactions with people who donated to other parties.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use the plural form "interactions" when referring to multiple instances of interaction. For example, use "few interactions" instead of "few interaction".
Common error
Avoid using the singular noun "interaction" with "few". Using "interaction" implies a single, specific instance, which contradicts the meaning of "few". Always use the plural form "interactions" to correctly convey the intended meaning of multiple instances.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "few interaction" is grammatically incorrect and functions as a noun phrase that intends to describe a limited quantity of exchanges. Ludwig AI indicates the phrase is incorrect and suggests using the plural form.
Frequent in
Science
70%
News & Media
20%
Academia
10%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "few interaction" is grammatically incorrect; the correct form is "few interactions". Ludwig AI confirms this grammatical error. While "few interaction" appears in various contexts, it's essential to use the plural form for grammatical accuracy. Alternatives include "limited interactions" or "minimal interactions". Remember to always use the plural noun "interactions" with "few" to properly convey a small number of interactions.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
limited interaction
Replaces "few" with "limited", emphasizing the restricted nature of the interaction.
minimal interaction
Substitutes "few" with "minimal", suggesting the interaction is at its smallest possible level.
scant interaction
Uses "scant" instead of "few", indicating a very small amount or insufficient quantity of interaction.
rare interaction
Replaces "few" with "rare", highlighting the infrequency of the interaction.
infrequent interaction
Similar to "rare interaction", but uses the adjective "infrequent" to describe the interaction.
very little interaction
Replaces "few" with "very little", emphasizing the small amount of interaction.
a small amount of interaction
Expresses the idea of "few interaction" using a more descriptive phrase.
lack of interaction
Focuses on the absence of interaction rather than a small quantity.
absence of interaction
Similar to "lack of interaction", but uses the noun "absence" for emphasis.
paucity of interaction
Uses "paucity" to indicate a small quantity or scarcity of interaction; more formal.
FAQs
What is the correct way to say "few interaction"?
The grammatically correct way to express this concept is by using the plural form: "few interactions". This refers to a small number of instances of interaction.
Are there alternatives to "few interactions"?
Yes, you can use phrases like "limited interactions", "minimal interactions", or "scant interaction" to convey a similar meaning.
Is "few interaction" ever correct?
No, "few interaction" is grammatically incorrect. The word "few" requires a plural noun. The correct form is always "few interactions".
How does the meaning change if I use "little interaction" instead of "few interactions"?
"Little interaction" refers to the amount of interaction in uncountable terms whereas "few interactions" emphasizes on counting each interaction one by one and the overall number being small. Although the meanings are very similar, the way you express them differs greatly.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested