Similarly, for females, accuracy improved significantly when female genotypes were added.
Random forest classification investigating the relationship between ADHD status and EF tests assessing: working memory, inhibition, cognitive flexibility, planning, and verbal fluency had only a modest ability to distinguish participants with ADHD from HC (males: accuracy = 0.734 ± 0.078, kappa = 0.466 ± 0.152; females: accuracy = 0.785 ± 0.078, kappa = 0.507 ± 0.175).
Random forest classification using BRIEF items was not quite as accurate in discriminating females with ADHD from female HC (accuracy = 0.923 ± 0.051, z = 4.29, p < 10-5 versus males; kappa = 0.818 ± 0.123, z = 4.85, p < 10-6).
Random forest classification indicated that co-existing symptom ratings was substantially better in distinguishing subjects with ADHD from HC in females (93% accuracy) than in males (86% accuracy).
For ungenotyped females, the accuracy of the QTL-EBV was much lower than for genotyped males, between 0.15 and 0.57 for NM, HAP2 and HAP4, but with the same trends across marker distances as for genotyped animals.
For female fertility, accuracies of GEBV in the validation populations were the same using multiple-breed or a single-breed reference population (scenarios 2 and 3 versus scenario 1), showing low sensitivity to the value of the genetic correlation.
Compared with traditional selection schemes, GS in dairy cattle enables earlier selection from a larger number of candidates, while maintaining (for males) or even increasing (for females) the accuracy of their estimated breeding values (EBV).
The best models for the phonetic feature set achieved 78.3% (NaïveBayes) for male and 68.5% (Bagging Bayes Net) for female speaker classification accuracy in detecting sleepiness.
Such surveys are always subject to recall bias, though unless there were systematic male versus female differences in accuracy of recall, this may not be an issue in this particular circumstance.
Although the study of Badr El Dine & El Shafei (2015) was conducted on Egyptians, they showed that only seven of 24 measurements of L1 were significantly different between males and females with low accuracy rate 68%.
