Suggestions(1)
Exact(5)
Indeed, both felt that this study contains some highly novel findings that should be published.
The reviewers felt that this study contains some highly novel and therefore 'provocative' findings which due to this novelty need further experimental verification.
The reviewers felt that this study is an important addition to the understanding of depression-related neurocircuits, and provides important insights into where Wfs1 deficiency could elicit depression-related behaviors.
Given an observed difference of 14%55%5% versus 69%) in the EMShockNet study between hyperoxic patients (PaO2 > 400) and nonhyperoxic patients, we felt that this study was adequately powered to detect a relationship between mortality and PaO2 > 400.
Given an observed difference of 6%38%8% versus 44%) in the EMShockNet study between hyperoxic survivors (PaO2 > 300) discharged to home and discharged nonhyperoxic survivors, we again felt that this study was adequately powered to detect a relationship between hyperoxia and discharge to home.
Similar(55)
Despite these limitations, we feel that this study extends our understanding of possible associations among teachers' knowledge and belief variables concerning teaching evolution in science and biology classes.
While we have a prior study of pan genu torsion patients without prior surgery, we feel that this study of patients who had prior failed nontorsional correcting surgery is a useful addition to the literature and a caveat to the knee surgeon.
The authors feel that this study may help the decision-makers to select the most suitable power option out of five power alternatives that have not been addressed before for large underground water pumping systems and can be applied for similar cases globally.
The Haredim feel that this study is a contribution to Judaism that is equal to if not greater than serving in the Israeli army.
However, for the caveats discussed above, we feel that this study should be considered as a pilot for future work.
Despite these empirical limitations, we feel that this study, contributes to the understanding of informal social interaction within learning.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com