Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Prelacteal feeds were defined as any food item given within the first three days.
Similar(59)
The conversion of naphtha feeds is defined as the total yield of the hydrocarbons from C1 to C4, hydrogen and coke.
Functional feeds are defined as high-quality feeds that, beyond their nutritional composition, are formulated with health promoting features that could be beneficial in supporting disease resistance and mitigation of clinical disease symptoms.
The patient's intolerance to feeding was defined on the basis of clinical signs (abdominal distention, vomiting, increase in serum lactate, high gastric residual volume).
Poor feeding was defined as the loss of appetite as stated by the parent in the case of infants and young children or by the individual if the child was coherent (older children).
Optimal infant and young child feeding is defined globally as early and exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months of a child's life, and continued breastfeeding for up to 2 years or longer, with the gradual introduction of age-appropriate, nutrient rich complementary foods from 6 months.
Categories of any breast-feeding were defined as <1, 1.1 3.0, 3.1–6.0, and ≥6 months.
Exclusive breast feeding was defined as breast feeding with no added supplements, and mixed breast-feeding was defined as breast-feeding with additional supplementary feeds (excluding medications).
Here, ground-level feeding is defined as feeding on vegetation within 1 m of ground height, mid-height feeding is defined as feeding between ground height and 10 m, and upper canopy feeding is feeding at all heights above 10 m.
Poor tolerance to enteral feeding was defined as a suspension of enteral feeding for any day during the week following the day the fecal sample had been obtained.
FAA during restricted feeding was defined as the number of wheel revolutions per minute from 4 hours before feeding time to the end of feeding time (total of 8 hours).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com