Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Male ApoE3L mice were housed in groups of 2 3 animals and fed standard chow (4.2% fat (w/w; 0.7% saturated, 1.2% MUFA and 1.6% PUFA), 22.3% protein, 33.9% starch and 5.7% sugars) (Beekay feeds, B & K Universal Ltd., Nittedal, Norway) and water ad libitum.
Similar(59)
The N retention (g/d) was similar among the calves fed B, C and D diets, however, it was higher (P < 0.05) than those fed A diet.
Dry matter intake by calves fed C diet was higher (P < 0.05) than those fed D diet and lower (P < 0.05) than calves fed A diet, however, it was similar to those fed B diet.
Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) concentration in calves fed B diet was higher (P < 0.05) than those fed D diet and was lower (P < 0.05) than those fed A diet, however, it was not different from calves fed C diet.
In Experiment 1, milk and milk fat yield were unaffected by treatment, although milk fat proportion was lower (37.1 versus 36.3 g/kg; P<0.01), but milk protein yield was higher (1.21 versus 1.24 kg/d; P=0.02) in cows fed B vitamins.
Better was to come for Ulster, who capped a spell of pressure with a slick handling move that saw the ball moved left then recycled and switched right where Tuohy fed Best and the hooker scuttled over for the try.
Although feeding B-DDGS tended to reduce ruminal ammonia-N (NH3-N) concentration compared with feeding W-DDGS (9.3 vs. 10.5 mg/dL), no differences were observed in plasma urea-N and milk urea-N concentrations.
The codebook size of N = { N g } g = 1, …, G is M=G(N−1)=2 B, and each user feeds back B bits quantization of the channel.
For feeds A, B, and C the TKN results were 1.08%, 1.13 % and 1.10%, respectively.
There were no differences for apparent CP digestibilities (feed A = 71.19%, feed B = 69.39%, and feed C = 68.37%).
The sensitivity of this bifurcation diagram has been studied with varying (a) methanol feed, (b) iso-butene feed, (c) inert feed and (d) reflux ratio.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com