Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(40)
Feeding was started 2 h into the light period after the tanks had been cleaned and routine water analyses had been made.
Feeding was started with the control diet but it was steadily substituted for the experimental diets during the adaptation period.
Feeding was started after 24 hrs, and was controlled on a weight basis.
In case of the CHO cell lines, feeding was started after an initial batch phase of 50 h.
Feeding was started after the batch ended, as indicated by a sudden increase of the DO-signal.
Feeding was started after 24 or 48 hours at a glucose feed rate of 1.44 or 0.96 g/L/h, respectively, and continued until 96 hours.
Similar(20)
Trophic feeds were started (10 ml/kg/day divided into three aliquots) in most infants once the vital signs were stabilized and the infant no longer required vasopressor support.
In this study however feeds were started late in both groups (mean 10.3 and 9.3 days), and were given as two-hourly infusions followed by 2-hourly fasts.
For example, enteral feeds are started at low rates, are advanced slowly, and maintained at a target maintenance rate with no provisions to compensate for loss of feeding time due to frequent interruptions.
4 In brief, enteral feeds were started on day 1 with either maternal expressed breast milk or donor expressed breast milk prior to consideration of the use of formula.
In conclusion, although enteral feeds are started within a mean time of 22.5 hours and full feeds achieved early, there is still room for improvement to increase the number of patients who achieve their caloric requirement during their stay in the ICU.
More suggestions(16)
feeding was implemented
feeding was switched
feeding was described
feeding was restricted
feeding was done
feeding was performed
feeding was determined
feeding was adjusted
feeding was used
feeding was established
feeding was discontinued
feeding was given
feeding was seen
feeding was observed
feeding had started
feeding was actuated
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com