feeded with

USAGE SUMMARY

"fed with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use the phrase when you are talking about providing someone with sustenance. For example, "The mother bird fed her hatchlings with a worm."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Animals were fed with calf liver.

Nature

The Bananas are fed with the milk cows.

University of California, Berkeley

The cell fed with methanol also shows a promising stability.

Catalysis Today

The crocodiles are fed with fresh meat every day.

The New Yorker

The children, plus 20 adults, were fed with emergency supplies.

The New York Times

It was watered, it was fed with Miracle-Gro.

The New York Times

Or all fed with tranquillisers in their lunch.

The Guardian

She has to be fed with a syringe.

The Guardian

The control group was gavage fed with ncRNA.

Nature

None of mosquitoes was ever fed with blood meal.

Nature

Mice were fed with standard diet (SD), CD, or KD.

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "feeded with". Instead, use the correct past participle form, "fed with", when describing the act of providing sustenance.

Common error

The incorrect use of "feeded" instead of "fed" can confuse readers. Always use "fed" as the past participle of "feed" when using the phrase.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "feeded with" is grammatically incorrect. The correct past participle form of "feed" is "fed". Ludwig's examples confirm the proper usage of "fed with" in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "feeded with" is grammatically incorrect; the correct form is "fed with". While the intention is usually to describe providing sustenance, the incorrect verb form undermines effective communication. Ludwig AI's analysis points to the proper usage and offers grammatically sound alternatives such as "nourished with" or "supplied with", depending on the specific context. Always ensure you're using the correct past participle, 'fed', in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

fed with

Corrects the grammatical error by using the past participle form of the verb 'feed'.

nourished with

Emphasizes the provision of essential substances for growth and health.

supplied with

Highlights the act of providing what is needed.

provided with sustenance

Formally indicates the act of giving food or other necessities of life.

given nourishment through

Specifies that nourishment is administered via a particular method or channel.

sustained by

Focuses on what provides continued existence or support.

given food through

Specifies that feeding occurs through a certain means.

maintained on

Highlights the idea of being kept alive or in good condition by a specific diet or substance.

ingested

Refers to consuming or taking in food or other substances.

consumed

Highlights the process of eating or using something up.

FAQs

Is "feeded with" grammatically correct?

No, "feeded with" is not grammatically correct. The correct form is "fed with", which uses the past participle of the verb "feed".

What is the difference between "feeded with" and "fed with"?

"Feeded" is not a standard English verb form. The past participle of "feed" is "fed with", which should be used when describing something that has been given food.

Can I use "feeded" in any context?

No, "feeded" is not a recognized word in standard English. You should always use "fed with" instead.

What are some alternatives to saying "fed with"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "nourished with", "supplied with", or "given sustenance through".