Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
feedback was used
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "feedback was used" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the application or utilization of feedback in a particular context, such as in evaluations or assessments. Example: "In the project review, it was noted that feedback was used to improve the final product."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Visual feedback was used to maintain the clenching level.
Their feedback was used to revise the posters.
Their feedback was used to improve the questions and eliminate redundancies.
Feedback was used to develop a draft of each mini-unit which was then pilot tested (see below).
Electromyography (EMG) feedback was used to impose constant activity in a part of the trunk extensor muscles.
The results showed the highest percentages of correct responses in matching during acquisition, maintenance and transference, when feedback was used.
Hayes et al. [15] exploited QOSTBC in a closed-loop relay network, where feedback was used to include phase rotations at the transmitter.
In some of the studies, users' design feedback was used as a budget approach to reach findings that one could also have reached through classical usability testing.
The channel model was characterized as a matrix product of transmitter, receiver, and scattering correlation matrices and the covariance feedback was used.
As a means of getting members of the development team committed to the adoption process, it described how their feedback was used to find main concerns and solving these.
Due to the illusion, the actual position would be higher than expected, and this feedback was used to adjust subsequent stepping trials.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Consider replacing "feedback was used" with more active voice constructions when appropriate to enhance clarity and engagement. For instance, "the team used feedback" is more direct.
Common error
Avoid using "feedback was used" without specifying the source of the feedback. Ambiguity can undermine the credibility of your statement. Instead of saying "Feedback was used", specify who provided the feedback, such as "User feedback was used", or "Expert feedback was used".
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "feedback was used" functions as a passive construction, indicating that feedback served as the instrument for an action. As Ludwig AI confirms, this construction is grammatically correct and commonly employed. This is shown in many examples.
Frequent in
Science
98%
Formal & Business
1%
News & Media
1%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "feedback was used" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed passive construction, primarily found in scientific and formal contexts. As Ludwig AI indicates, it effectively conveys the influence of external input on various processes or outcomes. While acceptable in diverse settings, it's crucial to attribute the feedback source for clarity and consider active voice alternatives to enhance directness. Remember to specify who provided the feedback and how it influenced the outcome.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
feedback was utilized
Replaces "used" with "utilized", offering a more formal tone while maintaining the core meaning.
feedback was applied
Substitutes "used" with "applied", emphasizing the active implementation of feedback.
feedback informed the process
Highlights the influence of feedback on a particular process or decision-making.
feedback shaped the outcome
Emphasizes the impact of feedback on the final result.
feedback contributed to the design
Focuses on the contribution of feedback to the design or development stage.
the process incorporated feedback
Shifts the focus to the process itself, highlighting its receptiveness to feedback.
feedback played a role
Indicates that feedback had a part in influencing something.
feedback served to
Highlights the function or purpose that feedback fulfilled.
feedback was instrumental in
Emphasizes the essential role of feedback in achieving a specific outcome.
input was leveraged
Focuses on how input, synonymous to feedback, was capitalized upon.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "feedback was used" to sound more active?
You can use active voice constructions like "we used feedback", "the team applied feedback", or "stakeholders' input informed the design".
What is a more formal alternative to "feedback was used"?
A more formal alternative would be "feedback was utilized" or "feedback was incorporated".
Is it always necessary to specify who provided the feedback when using the phrase "feedback was used"?
While not always grammatically required, specifying the source of feedback enhances clarity and credibility. Consider mentioning the source unless it's already clear from the context.
What is the difference between saying "feedback was used" and "feedback was helpful"?
"Feedback was used" implies that the feedback directly influenced a change or decision. "Feedback was helpful" simply suggests that the feedback provided value, without necessarily leading to a specific action.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested