Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
Finally, feedback was received from a high percentage of participants.
However, negative feedback was received from various operating departments, most notably on the Western Region.
Feedback was received from 12 health professionals.
Of 13 requests, pretest feedback was received from five practitioners.
As expected most feedback was received from family physicians and other specialists.
Feedback was received from participants in the original key informant interviews, as well as from individuals new to the project.
Similar(52)
Additional feedback forms were received from six midwives and emails with additional feedback were received from eight midwives.
Feedback on subsequent versions was received from all authors.
Positive feedback concerning the commercials was received from many quarters with only one complaint received, this from a non-Aboriginal person who lived in a regional centre and who requested that the 'disgusting' commercials not be screened at meal times.
In addition, feedback on the case studies was received from all countries and was taken seriously on the part of the respondents; the authors appreciated and incorporated the comments.
Feedback on the draft tool was received from 10 experts: 2 training programme managers; 2 district managers; 2 training complex co-ordinators; 3 researchers and the director of the Health Impact Assessment Directorate.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com