feedback was considered

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "feedback was considered" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the evaluation or assessment of feedback received on a particular subject or project. Example: "After reviewing the initial results, it was clear that the feedback was considered in the final decision-making process."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

11 human-written examples

Only a system with full feedback was considered in [13].

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

In [17], quatized CSI feedback was considered and a strategy of scaling quantization quality of both two-hop links was proposed.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Differently from [32, 33], in which no feedback was considered and whenever a packet was received in error then the packet was discarded, we use a general model in which packets are not discarded.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

User feedback was considered to be of the greatest importance for the development of the SRA's mission and for its internal working practices [29, 30, 31], but do planners actually use the approved user feedback mechanisms, or do they invent their own?

European Transport Research Review

In this meeting each item was discussed and patient specific feedback was considered.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

This feedback was considered more valuable than measurements such as cancellation rates because it was direct and without delay.

BMC Health Services Research

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

49 human-written examples

Both absolute position feedback and relative position feedback are considered.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Both state feedback and output feedback are considered.

European Journal of Control

Therefore, haptic feedback is considered an unmet need in laparoscopy.

Gynecological Surgery

Meanwhile, to improve the practicability of our research, imperfect CSIT feedback is considered.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

These types of feedback are considered as level 1 in CDAT coding.

International Journal of STEM Education

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "feedback was considered", ensure you clarify how the feedback influenced the subsequent actions or decisions. Be specific about the changes or adjustments made as a result.

Common error

Avoid stating merely that "feedback was considered" without detailing how it was considered or its impact. Vague statements reduce transparency and can make your writing less credible.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "feedback was considered" primarily functions as a declarative statement in the passive voice. It indicates that feedback received attention and was taken into account, aligning with the assessment provided by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

60%

Formal & Business

20%

News & Media

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "feedback was considered" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase to indicate that input was taken into account, as confirmed by Ludwig. It is frequently found in scientific and formal business contexts, serving to assure audiences of due diligence. To improve writing quality, be specific about how the feedback influenced decisions and avoid vagueness. Alternatives such as ""feedback was taken into account"" or "feedback was evaluated" may be more appropriate depending on the specific context. While simple, remember to clarify the impact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

feedback was taken into account

Replaces "considered" with "taken into account", emphasizing the action of actively using the feedback.

feedback was factored in

Substitutes "considered" with "factored in", highlighting the integration of feedback as a factor in the final result.

feedback was incorporated

Changes "considered" to "incorporated", emphasizing that feedback was integrated into the process or outcome.

feedback was evaluated

Changes "considered" to "evaluated", focusing on the assessment process of the feedback received.

feedback was reviewed

Replaces "considered" with "reviewed", suggesting a careful examination of the feedback.

feedback was assessed

Substitutes "considered" with "assessed", which indicates an evaluation of the value or importance of the feedback.

feedback played a role

Expresses that feedback had an influence or impact, rather than simply being thought about.

feedback was used

Highlights the utilization of feedback to inform actions or decisions.

feedback was heeded

Implies that feedback was not only considered but also followed or obeyed.

feedback had an impact

Focuses on the result or effect of considering the feedback.

FAQs

How can I use "feedback was considered" in a sentence?

You can use "feedback was considered" to indicate that feedback was taken into account during a process. For example, "After the pilot program, all user "feedback was collected", and this "feedback was taken into account" when redesigning the user interface."

What are some alternatives to "feedback was considered"?

Alternatives include ""feedback was taken into account"", "feedback was evaluated", or "feedback was incorporated", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when describing how feedback was used?

While "feedback was considered" uses passive voice, you can use active voice to be more direct: "The team considered the feedback". Both are acceptable, but active voice can often make your writing more engaging.

What does it mean when someone says "feedback was considered but not implemented"?

It means that the feedback was reviewed and thought about, but ultimately not acted upon. This could be due to various reasons, such as feasibility constraints, conflicting priorities, or a determination that the feedback didn't align with the project's goals.