Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of two different forms of feedback on spelling performance of Dutch Grade-2 students, that is, knowledge-of-results and informational feedback.
Ah, spelling.
Consider grammar and spelling.
In these cases, spelling followed English spelling rules.
Poor spelling.
Check spelling.
Review for spelling errors.
Practice wet season spelling.
In the knowledge-of-results feedback condition, the speller is told that the word is spelled incorrectly, whereas in the informational feedback condition, the speller is told what is spelled incorrectly.
Bows and magic are more satisfying, though the "stream" style spells you get have very little feedback.
The only effect that was replicable is that of feedback inconsistency reported by Stone, Vanhoy, and Van Orden (1997, Experiment 2): Participants needed more time to accept a word that is feedback inconsistent, meaning that its pronunciation body can be spelled in more than one way (for instance, the rime of a syllable with the sound /ip/ can be spelled – eep, as in deep or – eap, as in heap).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com