Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Open image in new window Fig. 5 Contours of a reaction rate, b temperature, c mass fraction of methanol, d mass fraction of O2, e O2/CH3OH ratio for a constant feed, sweep, fuel flow rate of 1e−3, 1e−5 and 5.5e−7 kg/s, respectively.
Open image in new window Fig. 4 Comparison of a partial pressure of O2, b O2 flux along the ITM length on the permeate side of the membrane for a constant feed, sweep, fuel flow rate of 1e−3, 1e−5 and 5.5e−7 kg/s, respectively.
Figure 5: Contours of (a) reaction rate (b) temperature (c) mass fraction of methanol (d) mass fraction of O2 (e) O2/CH3OH ratio for a constant feed, sweep, fuel flow rate of 1e−3 kg/s, 1e−5 kg/s and 5.5e−7 kg/s, respectively.
Similar(57)
The membrane reactor performance has been studied as a function of the feed and sweep flow rates and of the sweep (co- or counter-current sweep modes).
It was found that parameters such as the inlet gases temperature (feed and sweep), percentage of CH4 in the sweep gas mixture and the reactor geometry can have great effects on the operation of ITM reactors.
The design of the gas turbine combustor is calculated based on optimizations of flow configuration (co and counter current), shell side and tube side (feed and sweep) flow rates, inlet fuel concentration in the sweep flow (CH4 plus CO2), and membrane tube diameter, pitch (spacing) and length.
Subsequently, the effects of feed and sweep flow rates on temperature and reaction characteristics are presented.
Pressure outlet boundary condition is used for both the feed and sweep zones flow exit.
Subsequently, the effects of flow rates of feed and sweep on temperature and reaction characteristics are also explored.
Also, there are less important parameters like, feed and sweep volume flow rates, oxygen partial pressure in the feed side.
In contrast, there are some other parameters that are less important such as feed and sweep gas volume flow rates and oxygen partial pressure in the feed side.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com