featuring with

USAGE SUMMARY

'featuring with' is not a correct phrase in written English.
You could use the phrase 'featuring' or 'together with' instead, depending on the context. For example, you could say: "The event featured live music together with various art exhibitions."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

"Monster" (featuring 50 Cent)6.

The New York Times

Featuring 60 teams.

The New York Times - Arts

47 models took part, featuring 81 looks.

Independent

Third annual Gaelen Art Gallery Juried Invitational Show, featuring 48 pieces.

The New York Times

Ninth annual National Computer Art Invitational, featuring 30 artists.

The New York Times

"It's Nothin'" (featuring 2 Chainz).

Vice

The Magazine featuring Chase Hattan 7. I Got Caught featuring Martin Luther 8. I'm a Stop featuring 50 Cent 9. Hog Ridin' featuring Richie Rich 10.

Vice

The Magazine featuring Chase Hattan 7. I Got Caught featuring Martin Luther 8. I'm A Stop featuring 50 Cent 9. Hog Ridin' featuring Richie Rich 10.

Vice

She grew up on an apiary featuring 100 million bees.

Huffington Post

In animals, four amino acid substitutions distinguish H3.1 featuring A31-S87-V89-M90 from H3.3 featuring S31-A87-I89-G90 [ 8].

BioMed Research International

It features 130 separate puzzles.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "featuring with". The correct and more common way to indicate that something includes or highlights a particular element is simply "featuring".

Common error

Using "featuring with" is redundant because "featuring" already implies inclusion or accompaniment. Adding "with" creates an unnecessary and grammatically incorrect phrase.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "featuring with" is grammatically incorrect. According to Ludwig AI, the word "featuring" should be used without the addition of "with".

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "featuring with" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided. As Ludwig AI points out, the correct form is simply "featuring". There are no examples of this phrase in the provided data, indicating it's not a recognized or accepted usage. Alternatives like "featuring", "together with", or "along with" can be used to convey similar meanings while maintaining grammatical accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

featuring

Omits the unnecessary 'with', using the standard form.

together with

Replaces "featuring" with a prepositional phrase indicating accompaniment.

along with

Similar to "together with", emphasizing addition.

in conjunction with

Indicates a combined or cooperative action rather than a primary feature.

in combination with

Suggests a merging of elements.

which includes

Specifies that something is part of a larger group or set.

highlighting

Emphasizes that something is being given special attention.

that showcases

Highlights the element as a prominent display.

presenting

Focuses on the act of showing or offering something.

and also

Simple addition of elements.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "featuring" in a sentence?

Use "featuring" followed directly by the element being highlighted or included, for example, "The concert is featuring local artists".

What can I say instead of "featuring with"?

Use alternatives like "featuring", "together with", or "along with" depending on the context.

Why is "featuring with" considered grammatically incorrect?

The word "featuring" already implies inclusion or accompaniment, making "with" redundant and grammatically superfluous.

How does using just "featuring" change the meaning compared to "featuring with"?

Using just "featuring" maintains the intended meaning of highlighting or including something, while avoiding grammatical errors.