The energy field (force stretched out as space) returns there as well, as the only exception to Kant's critical rule not to talk about the intelligible features of mind-independent nature.
Cordemoy's first argument for the distinction begins by listing a number of features of bodies, and contrasts this with a list of features of minds.
Humans commonly live only with glimpses of reflective self-awareness (the feature of Mind – state 3), and often are only dimly aware of their own states 1 and 2, unless suffering from some pathological malady, the extreme sensation of which draws attention to a particular locality of the Sensorium.
The usual starting point of the theory of intentionality can be rendered as follows: (1) intentionality is taken to be a feature of minds, (2) minds are to be conceived as individual minds (or minds of individuals), and (3) it seems that each individual has his or her own mind.
He held that some features of the mind and its knowledge had a priori origins, i.e., must be in the mind prior to experience (because using them is necessary to have experience).
While he is happy to be a reductionist about non-conscious features of the mind, like intelligence, or intuitive decision-making, he is less sanguine about feelings themselves.
Modern materialists do not regard the emergent features of the mind as either ontologically or explanatorily fundamental.
These are fundamental features of the mind that we take for granted but there are examples of what happens when that machinery breaks down.
Often, and especially when underpinned by an expressivist account of the problematic statements, antirealism of this second kind amounts to a version of "projectivism," according to which, in making such statements, one is not seeking to correctly describe features of a mind-independent world but is merely projecting one's own responses and attitudes onto it.
The question of whether or not an individual's intentional states are collective is therefore settled by internal features of individual minds.
Many theologians have looked to features of the human mind or "psyche" to find models to help illuminate the doctrine of the trinity.
