Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

features of discussions

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "features of discussions" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing the characteristics or elements that are present in discussions, such as topics, styles, or dynamics. Example: "The features of discussions in this forum include open-ended questions and respectful debate."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Our aim was to identify features of discussions that could promote or inhibit optimal recruitment.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

We analyzed how the features of these discussions related to performance, and we discovered that certain features of discussion differ in response to instructor cues.

Transcripts were then coded for features of discussion (described in Data Analysis), and these features were summed across discussions.

This becomes a standard feature of discussions of skepticism.

Science

SEP

These tasks should become a habitual and regular feature of discussions in families and communities so that each person becomes capable of reducing risk in their daily activity at home, office, school, and on the street.

Whilst some CAB members speak or are able to understand more than one language, there is no single common language and so multiple translations are a key feature of discussions at CAB meetings.

In part, this is about creating the genuine "enabling environments" that have been such a feature of discussion in the post-2015 agenda.

News & Media

The Guardian

EQUIP was chosen to identify features of teachers' discussions and inquiry-based instruction in this study.

Small datasets, poorly constructed hypotheses and assertive rhetoric are the prominent features of current discussions on a human role in megafaunal extinctions.

The above analyses indicate that LAs had few significant effects on global features of student discussions.

To better identify features of online discussion, we introduce below the most common ones, using the previous illustrative discussion thread.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When analyzing group discussions, clearly define which "features of discussions" you are evaluating, such as participation rate, topic relevance, or tone.

Common error

Avoid vague references to "features of discussions" without specifying which aspects you are addressing. For example, instead of saying 'The features of discussions were positive', specify 'The features of discussions, such as active listening and respectful disagreement, were positive'.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "features of discussions" functions as a noun phrase. It typically serves as the subject or object of a sentence, referring to the characteristics or attributes present within conversational exchanges. As confirmed by Ludwig, this phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

30%

Encyclopedias

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "features of discussions" is a versatile noun phrase used to identify and analyze various characteristics within conversations and debates. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. As evidenced by various examples, this phrase is commonly employed in academic, scientific, and news media contexts to describe elements such as participation rate, topic relevance, and communication styles. When using this phrase, it's important to specify which features are being evaluated to avoid vagueness and ensure clarity. Alternatives such as "discussion characteristics" and "aspects of dialogue" can provide nuanced ways to describe these conversational attributes.

FAQs

How can I describe "features of discussions"?

You can describe "features of discussions" by identifying key elements such as participation level, topic relevance, tone, and the use of evidence. Also, you can use alternatives like "discussion characteristics", "aspects of dialogue", or "conversation attributes".

What are some common "features of discussions" in academic settings?

In academic settings, common "features of discussions" include critical analysis, evidence-based arguments, respectful disagreement, and synthesis of diverse viewpoints. These are often evaluated to measure understanding and engagement.

How do online "features of discussions" differ from face-to-face discussions?

Online "features of discussions" often involve asynchronous communication, reliance on written text, and potential for anonymity. This can impact the tone, participation levels, and overall dynamics of the discussion compared to face-to-face interactions.

What makes certain "features of discussions" more effective than others?

Effective "features of discussions" typically include active listening, clear articulation of ideas, constructive feedback, and a focus on collaborative problem-solving. These elements contribute to deeper understanding and more productive outcomes.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: