Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(5)
Ninety-seven questionnaires were studied for feasibility (Table 1).
Nevertheless, the entire questionnaire was completed by over 95% of patients, and therefore showed good feasibility (Table 2).
The findings searched for patterns of each method and subsequently between methods, and grouped by research question related to fidelity, acceptability and feasibility (Table 1).
Amongst the dynamic items the associations of subsequent discharge were lower scores for C1 'lack of insight', C3 'active symptoms of major mental illness', C5 'unresponsiveness to treatment' and R1 'plans lack feasibility' (Table 5).
This section described in detail how the methods proposed by the UKMRC framework were used to operationalise each step: expert consensus (e.g. drafting of the PtDA), literature review (e.g. collating clinical evidence), individual interviews (e.g. needs assessment) and questionnaire surveys (e.g. acceptability and feasibility) (Table 2).
Similar(55)
Significant statistical differences were found between two subgroups concerning eight measures based on importance and three measures based on feasibility (Tables 5 and 6).
The Feasibility Scorecard (Table 2) synthesizes data from multiple primary and secondary data sources, organizes findings by topical area (acceptability, infrastructure, implementation capacity, value for money, risks, and flexibility/responsiveness), and highlights issues that vary by community risk level or governorate.
A majority of participants had used a number of illicit substances the last 30 days prior to intake to the feasibility trial (Table 1).
The remaining CO data was divided into two sets; one set ("DEMS") comprising DEMS and the feasibility study (Table 1) and the other ("MIDAS") containing the remaining CO data (mainly MIDAS data).
The demographic analysis shows that about half of the participants assessed themselves to have much experience with feasibility studies (see Table 2).
Classification and subsequent focus groups reduced this pool to 102 items, which were submitted to the acceptability and feasibility study (see Table I).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com