Sentence examples for feasibility ranking from inspiring English sources

O = Overall combined importance and feasibility ranking I = Importance ranking F = Feasibility ranking The medium rated education strategies included: expand interprofessional education; provide incentives for students interested in rural practice; summer mentorship programs for high school students; and aboriginal student support program.

O = Overall Ranking; I = Importance Ranking; F = Feasibility Ranking Education strategies that were rated highly important and feasible are described in Table 5.

O = Overall Ranking; I = Importance Ranking; F = Feasibility Ranking Since the purpose of the panel was to identify recruitment and retention and education strategies that could inform the development of a HHR plan for rehabilitation professionals, there was also discussion about contextual factors that would influence a plan.

The third round measures from both ranking fields (importance and feasibility), which ranked the best and the worst, are given in Tables 1, 2, 3 and 4. Large values of IR mean that the first and third quartiles are far apart, indicating high variability of the answers and consequently, indicating a high level of disagreement among panellists.

Our results support the feasibility of relevance ranking Boolean search result sets from systematic reviews.

Our findings will help determine the feasibility of accurately ranking cultivars or agronomic treatments for SSF ethanol yield using high-throughput methods and without the apparatus for SSF-type assays.

1 It is used for ranking lead-optimization compounds and judging feasibility of the target and of chemical series, and informing the design of phase I and IIa trials in early clinical development.

This also further proves the effectiveness of both our automatic figure ranking and proposed new UI as well as the feasibility and robustness of integrating them to facilitate information browsing in biological domain.

They rated the strategies in order of importance and ranked the feasibility of each using a 5-point Likert scale (Table  3).

Responses to only 1 of the first 15 statements ranked by feasibility and importance were found to be significantly different between the PHC and MI experts.

The second step involved each participant selecting and ranking their top three research priorities, while taking into account their feasibility within the Australian context.