Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Reaction times presented in Figure 2 reveal significantly faster responding to Transitive, Equivalence and Symmetrical relations relative to Foils (P <.001) and significantly faster responding to Transitive and Equivalence relations relative to Symmetrical relations (P <.05).
Participants were faster responding to Hiragana items (847 ms) compared with Kanji items (904 ms; F1,33 = 27.3, P < 0.001) and for words (815 ms) compared with nonwords (937 ms; F1,33 = 17.3, P < 0.001).
Faster responding to targets replacing threatening cues, indicating selective attention toward threat, occurs in individuals with pathological worry (Bradley, Mogg, White, Groom, & DeBono, 1999; MacLeod, Mathews, & Tata, 1986; Mogg, Mathews, & Eysenck, 1992).
Similar(57)
This contrast showed that there was no evidence that items that differed in three phonetic features were faster responded to than items that differed in one phonetic feature, F (1, 20) < 1, p = 0.57, partial η 2 = 0.02.
Fast communication may lead to fast responding to customer requirements, which results in high agile development performance (Cockburn 2007; Misra et al. 2009).
By 7 dpf, zebrafish larvae swim fast, respond to a wide variety of sensory stimuli and exhibit a broad range of behaviours.
Subjects were faster in responding to short intervals in the left space, whereas they were faster in responding to long intervals in the right space.
Males also produced longer vocalizations and reached the maximum frequency faster when responding to playbacks (Table 2).
RTs tended to be faster in responding to words denoting animals (fauna) than to words denoting plants (flora) (Fauna = 551 ms, SD = 48.32; Flora = 562 ms, SD = 53.70).
We also hypothesized that adults would be more accurate and faster at responding to matched control words as compared with morphologically complex words on all word types.
Moreover, there were significant correlation between ERPs and behavioural data, participants devoted more attention and had faster responding time to preferred products than to nonpreferred.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com