Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(59)
One small study found that when combined with an AST or ALT > 100 IU/L the specificity of the FAST examination was 98%%, suggesting a negative FAST and transaminases <100 IU/L should result in patient observation instead of abdominal CT scanning [104].
Describe the indications for the FAST examination.
Recognize specific pitfalls involved with the FAST examination.
Describe the limitations of the FAST examination The FAST examination does not effectively evaluate solid organs for injuries.
Describe the relevant anatomy to be identified with the FAST examination The FAST examination utilizes four specific locations to evaluate for intraperitoneal, intrathoracic, and pericardial fluid.
The FAST examination does not effectively evaluate solid organs for injuries.
The FAST examination utilizes four specific locations to evaluate for intraperitoneal, intrathoracic, and pericardial fluid.
FAST examination results were available for 359 patients; 27 were positive.
Indications for performing FAST examination mentioned in the trauma manuals and number of hospitals.
The technique is similar to the one used during the FAST examination.
Similar(1)
The "extended" FAST (e-FAST) examination also assesses the chest for pneumothorax.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com