Sentence examples for far-reaching rules from inspiring English sources

But Justice Stein rejected the energy companies' claim that the Department of Environmental Conservation did not have sufficient authority to adopt such stringent and far-reaching rules.

But the book that electrified contemporaries such as Scott and Butterfield was The True Principles of Pointed or Christian Architecture of 1841, in which he expounded the far-reaching rules of honesty of construction and subordination of ornament to function.

WASHINGTON, Sept. 28 — The Senate approved a measure on Thursday on the interrogations and trials of terrorism suspects, establishing far-reaching rules to deal with what President Bush has called the most dangerous combatants in a different type of war.

Despite efforts by the FCC to find a way around the April appeals court decision, it now seems likely that any far-reaching rules will take an act of Congress.

The far-reaching rules by the Financial Services Authority would put pressure on financial services firms to buy £110 billion, or $175 billion, in government bonds or other assets that would remain liquid during a financial crisis, thereby reducing the likelihood of bank failures.

And now President Bush has his cabinet and staff busily writing far-reaching rules to keep his priorities on the environment, public lands, homeland security, health and safety in place long after the clock strikes midnight and his presidential limousine turns into a pumpkin.

South African maize producers called for much more far-reaching rule changes to cope with the situation.

But this year, because of a far-reaching rule change in China, some of the recyclables are ending up in the local dump anyway.

The far-reaching rule will dictate how coal ash, which has contaminated waterways in two high-profile spills in Tennessee and North Carolina in the past decade, is stored at more than 400 coal-fired power plants around the country.

To permit that result, Justice Rehnquist had to create a potentially far-reaching rule that whenever government has power to ban a product - even where the power is not invoked - it has the derivative power to suppress speech about the product.

This is a far-reaching rule for two reasons.