Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Figure 8 shows that the baseline errors of different combination strategies RTK positioning for the FAR method and the PAR method.
The receiver brands and firmware versions of the long-baseline experiment are shown in Fig. 2. The AR results of different combination strategy are shown for 500 min of data in Fig. 5 for the full ambiguity resolution (FAR) method and in Fig. 6 for the PAR method, including the AR success rate, number of ambiguities and ratio values.
Similar(58)
Fig. 8 Positioning results of the three baselines with GPS + Galileo LC, TC, and TC + ISB RTK for the FAR method (left panel) and the PAR method (right panel).
Fig. 7 Positioning results of the three baselines with GPS + Galileo LC, TC, and TC + ISB static relative positioning for the FAR method (left panel) and the PAR method (right panel).
The proportions of fixed solution of the NNOR-CUT0 long-baseline static relative positioning under the three different combinations of LC, TC, and TC + ISB for the FAR method is 11.98, 17.33 and 17.40%, respectively.
So far, methods for generation of data on lung cancer comorbidity have attracted little attention.
So far, methods for reducing nanopore diameter have been divided into two categories.
However, despite the rich social scientific literature on these topics, we are still far from methods and tools that can recognize, quantify, and correct social biases at the scale necessary to address these societal challenges.
Rather, the doctrine has been characterized by abrupt shifts as far as methods and materials are concerned, even if the goal has remained relatively constant through such changes.[2] We shall allow the pattern of change to become evident as the different phases of logicism are recounted below.
So far, the reference method and all the alternative methods require a pre-enrichment step lasting 24 h to several days.
The crimes might also be connected, suggestively although, at the moment, far less than conclusively by method and possible motive.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com