Sentence examples for familiarity process from inspiring English sources

One possibility, consistent with Yonelinas (1994), is that items that are not recollected can be recognized based on a continuous, familiarity process that operates under the assumptions of SDT.

After the visual encoding of the stimuli in occipital regions, three separable memory processes took place: a familiarity process (temporal cortex), a recollection process (temporal cortex and supramarginal gyrus), and a representational process (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex).

Determining to what extent this familiarity process takes place in the frontal cortical regions would be an interesting future experiment since, in the framework of Bar's model, this may influence the selection of the templates that are used to perform the task.

It also plays an appreciable role in familiarity processes for these stimuli.

We conclude that GBA is important for controlling and organizing memory traces of relational information in both short-term binding and long-term memory, while frontal occipital coherence in the beta band may facilitate familiarity processes.

These results are reminiscent of cerebral patterns associated with recollection and familiarity processes, respectively.

It has been consistently described in the literature that in contrast to recollection processes, familiarity processes are relatively unaffected by aging [16], [17], [18].

This paradigm is the only one that allows a comparison of behaviour between a control and a test group, while evaluating an animal's behaviour across multiple conditions and facilitating the exclusion of simple rule-based learning or familiarity processes.

Indeed, although the hippocampus and other parts of the medial temporal lobe are known to contribute to recollection [26] [28], for some authors these areas appear also to subserve familiarity processes [29] [32].

Perceptual familiarity processes remain stable in aging, whereas the age-associated decline in memory recollection performance and forming associations [19] could be due to altered neural functioning particularly in the prefrontal cortex [20].

Functional data were analyzed until the subject responded (mean response time 5.46 sec) to highlight mainly the familiarity processes and to minimize the influence of retrieval of more specific information as recollection processes about the item or subvocal labeling that could occur after their response.