The result that the birds in general took longer to discriminate familiar motif modifications than unfamiliar motif modifications may indicate familiarity per se provides for some restoration.
A general linear mixed model ANOVA was used for evaluating the effects of the fixed factors familiarity (familiar, unfamiliar) and motif modification (gap motif, noise motif) on the response latencies for making the discrimination from a background of complete motifs.
The central topics usually revolve around: "grid extension as health threat," "real estate losing value," "modification of familiar environment".
Furthermore, previous studies have not found any effect modification by familiar predisposition on the use of HRT (Ursin et al, 2002).
Following discharge, the PWD often had some improvement in their confusion when they returned to a familiar environment, and needed modifications in prescribed medicines (dose reductions or cessation of medications).
The finding that the birds were significantly faster to discriminate a modification of a familiar motif with gaps from the complete motif than to discriminate a familiar motif with noise-filled gaps from the complete motif indicates that the latter difference is less salient to the birds.
The same question was addressed in Experiment 1b but with a small procedural modification ('familiar + familiar object').
The mean distances for discriminating modifications of 10 familiar and the 10 unfamiliar motifs are plotted in Fig. 3.
Average response latencies for discriminating familiar and unfamiliar noise motif modifications from complete motifs were 1478 and 955 ms, respectively (p<0.0005).
Average response latencies for discriminating familiar and unfamiliar gap motif modifications from complete motifs were 1219 and 1002 ms, respectively (p = 0.0042).
