Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
It is a plot between true positive proportion (TP/TP+FN) and false positive proportion (FP/FP+TN).
To our knowledge, this is the first detailed comparison of power and false positive proportion comparisons between existing interaction analysis approaches and those based on information theory.
A study from the Rakai cohort in Uganda, reports a false positive proportion of 43.7% (129/295) with a tiebreaker algorithm of Determine/STAT-PAK®/Unigold™ at a HIV prevalence of 11.2% [ 4].
Although capillary blood Pb measurements can be compromised by contamination errors during collection, the Wadsworth Center has estimated that false positive errors, defined as a false positive proportion, are typically < 5% at 10 μg/dL (Parsons et al. 1997).
Similar(56)
False positive proportions used the number of false positives detected at the highest decision threshold among all surveillance systems (Natural 18 with p-value = 0.0333) as the denominator for all surveillance systems.
Because the NHANES data are cross-sectional and lack incident CHD information, analyses used C-statistics from receiver operating curves (ROC) to evaluate the predictive ability (i.e., comparison of the sensitivity and false positive proportions) of the of the SRI on the CHD biological risk factors [ 30, 31].
FP : False positives (proportion of animals that were RBPT positive but c-ELISA negative).
For example, at a q≤0.2, we expect a false-positive proportion of 20% among identified associations.
The q-value threshold used for constructing the immune escape maps was q≤0.05, meaning that we would expect only a 5% false-positive proportion among associations displayed on our maps.
Similarly, microarray analysis indicated five aneuploid calls among 129 single euploid cells, for a false-positive proportion of 3.9% (Supplementary Material, Table SIII).
AFS-quant detected a false-positive proportion of 0.64% DNA reads in the buffalo genome (Table 3), which probably represent sequences strongly conserved between the two bovines.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com