false excitation

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "false excitation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to science, engineering, or psychology, where it refers to a situation where a stimulus leads to a response that is not genuine or accurate. Example: "The experiment showed that the false excitation of the neurons led to misleading results in the data analysis."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

This error analysis, found in the companion paper (Part I), is applied in deriving corrections for actual measurements, in the assessment of the excitation's quality and in judging the sensitivity of the measurement object to false excitation.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

It is shown that the maximum error is comprised of two distinct parts: one due to an erroneous input of rotation due to false excitations and the other due to errors in the measurement of the moment.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

SE-MPM images had observable cross-excitation and false positive bleed-through of green fluorescence signal in the red channel (yellow cells Figure 4c).

BMC Biotechnology

The emotional state of the highly activated modes of anger or stressed speech is caused by the fast air flow which causes vortices located near the false vocal folds providing additional excitation signals other than the pitch.

EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing

All fluorescence microscopy images presented here are false-color images acquired with the excitation and emission filter settings being Ex470/40 Em525/50 for the Alexa Fluor 488 and Oregon Green dye, Ex531/40 Em593/40 for the NBD and the Alexa Fluor 555 dye, and Ex620/60 Em700/75 for the Alexa 633 and Alexa 647 dye.

ACS Nano

We report increased signal-to-noise ratios and decreased false positive emission bleed-through using this novel multiple-excitation MPM (ME-MPM) compared to conventional single-excitation MPM (SE-MPM) in a variety of multi-color imaging applications.

BMC Biotechnology

Under identical VBF settings, SE-MPM at 970 nm achieved similar signal intensity as ME-MPM but showed increased cross-excitation and false-positive bleed-through in the emission channels, thereby adding ambiguity to the final image.

BMC Biotechnology

For each staining, one-two series from three to five different individuals were analyzed per genotype using a confocal microscope with 1, 2 or 3 lines of excitation, in sequential scanning in order to avoid false positives.

Plosone

Even better performance in terms of false alarm rate, would be an instrument utilizing two UV excitation wavelengths, as asserted by publications on laser induced fluorescence measurements on individual particle aerosols [ 26, 27, 29, 30].

Biomedical Optics Express

The excitation time was increased to test for a possible false negative connection.

eLife

However, as we noted earlier, the SE-MPM setup required systematic evaluation of excitation at several intermediate wavelengths to find the optimal wavelength to excite both fluorophores relatively equally without evoking false positive bleed-through signal, and this led to slower experimental set up times and increased exposure to excitation light before the time-lapse imaging could begin.

BMC Biotechnology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "false excitation" in scientific writing, clearly define the context in which the excitation is considered false. Specify the expected normal excitation for comparison to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "false excitation" when you actually mean a weak or diminished excitation. "False excitation" implies a misleading or incorrect signal, whereas weak excitation simply refers to the signal's intensity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "false excitation" functions primarily as a noun phrase, where "false" modifies the noun "excitation". It indicates an excitation event that is misleading, incorrect, or not genuine. As Ludwig AI explains, this phrase is usable in English and refers to a stimulus leading to a response that is not genuine or accurate.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "false excitation" is a scientifically relevant term that describes misleading or incorrect activation signals, as supported by Ludwig AI. Predominantly used in academic and scientific contexts, this phrase necessitates precise usage to avoid confusion with similar concepts like weak excitation. While less common, understanding its proper application is crucial for accurate data interpretation. Alternative phrases, like "spurious stimulation", provide nuanced options for expressing similar concepts. For best practice, specify the normal expected excitation to avoid ambiguity. In essence, the accurate application of "false excitation" reinforces the integrity of scientific discourse.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

spurious stimulation

Replaces "false" with "spurious," emphasizing the illegitimate or invalid nature of the stimulation.

inaccurate activation

Focuses on the lack of accuracy in the activation process rather than the falseness of the excitation itself.

erroneous triggering

Highlights that the excitation is a result of an error in the triggering mechanism.

artificial excitation

Implies that the excitation is not naturally occurring but rather artificially induced, possibly leading to false results.

deceptive stimulation

Suggests that the stimulation is misleading and could lead to incorrect interpretations.

pseudo-excitation

Uses the prefix "pseudo-" to indicate that the excitation is not genuine or real.

sham excitation

Emphasizes the deceptive and insincere nature of the excitation.

simulated excitation

Indicates that the excitation is a simulation and not a genuine response.

unauthentic excitation

Directly states that the excitation lacks authenticity and is not genuine.

invalid excitation

Highlights that the excitation is not valid or legitimate.

FAQs

How is "false excitation" typically used in scientific research?

In scientific research, "false excitation" often refers to an incorrect or misleading signal that mimics a real response. For example, in fluorescence microscopy, it can refer to bleed-through between channels.

What are some synonyms for "false excitation"?

Synonyms for "false excitation" include "spurious stimulation", "inaccurate activation", or "erroneous triggering" depending on the context.

How do I prevent "false excitation" in experiments?

To prevent "false excitation", ensure proper calibration of equipment, use appropriate controls, and carefully select excitation and emission settings to minimize cross-talk or bleed-through.

What is the difference between "false excitation" and "background noise"?

"False excitation" implies a signal that seems genuine but is incorrect, while "background noise" refers to random, unwanted signals that obscure the real data.