Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "false equivalencies" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing situations where two things are inaccurately compared as if they are equal or similar.
Example: "The argument presented by the speaker was filled with false equivalencies that undermined the validity of their claims."
Alternatives: "misleading comparisons" or "incorrect parallels".
Exact(27)
Reject false equivalencies.
Now is the time to burn false equivalencies forever.
Even there we are doing so by creating false equivalencies.
In the past few months, the media have drawn an abundance of false equivalencies between Clinton and Trump.
We have seen a great number of false equivalencies in the past two years, and the most recent Presidential election was defined by them.
Trump was attempting to take advantage of the false equivalencies that have riddled this presidential campaign, almost always to Hillary Clinton's detriment.
Similar(33)
With conservative attacks on Clinton's emails we have the political equivalent of a Turducken: a terrible case of false equivalency wrapped in phony indignation stuffed uncomfortably into affected righteous indignation.
That's a false equivalency.
3. False equivalency in government shutdown coverage.
That seems to be a false equivalency.
But please spare us the false equivalency.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com