Sentence examples for fallacy in a from inspiring English sources

To assess the prevalence of the analyzed fallacies in the sample material, the presence of a particular fallacy in a single article, book or online text was listed.

Because motivated inferences result from unconscious mental processes rather than explicit reasoning, the errors in inferences cannot be exposed simply by identifying a fallacy in a reconstructed argument.

The analysis of fallacies belongs to the normative study of arguments and argumentation, and to give an account of what the fallacy in a given argument is will involve making reference to some norm of argumentation.

Not controlling for obesity at the individual level but including it as an ecologic variable could cause spurious effects (i.e., ecologic fallacy) in a one-level model; however, we used a multilevel model with random effects, which includes effects at their appropriate levels and eliminates the risk.

Lu Hong and I identified this fallacy in an early paper.

As a weighted analysis at the country level is likely to bias results toward more populous countries, unweighted analysis has been recommended to avoid fallacy in an ecological study such as this one [ 48, 49].

Begging the question fits under the heading of a non-logical, material fallacy in which a premise has been unduly assumed, and ignoratio elenchi is a non-logical, material fallacy in which an irrelevant conclusion has been reached.

The angry Web site BegTheQuestion.info (motto: "Get it Right") defines it as "a logical fallacy in which an argument is assumed to be true without evidence other than the argument itself".

How do we handle statistical fallacies in a world in which few citizens (and even academics) have even a basic understanding of statistics or data?

In the research literature, Woods and Walton have discussed the definition, analysis and assessment of a variety of fallacies in a series of articles and books, first as co-authors and then individually (see, e.g., Woods and Walton 1989, Walton 1989, Woods 1995, Walton 1992, Walton 2000).

A paralogism is "the type of fallacy in which an error of reasoning is typically committed by failing to meet some necessary requirement of an argumentation scheme" whereas "the sophism type of fallacy is a sophistical tactic used to try to unfairly get the best of a speech partner in an exchange of arguments" (2010, 171; see also 1995, 254).