The phrase "fallacious to" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used before a noun or noun phrase to describe something that is deceitful or based on false reasoning. Here is an example sentence: It is fallacious to believe that all politicians are corrupt.
It is fallacious to argue that because no one is storming the castle, no real injustice exists.
Campbell called it fallacious to believe that Olympic sponsors would prefer visiting New York, where some of them are located, over Colorado Springs.
"The argument is fallacious to begin with and plays on people's fears -- the two aren't connected," she said of the link between terror and drug abuse.
It's fallacious to think that simply the statement of a problem, and the provision of an appallingly insensitive, brutal "solution" to this problem, is an ethical option.
In fact it is just as fallacious to consider speed in isolation from volume as it is to do the reverse - the pair form two sides of a speed-data-time triangle.
As Hume and Kant pointed out, however, it is fallacious to derive a proposition with existential import from a tautology, and it is now generally agreed that, from a tautology alone, it is impossible to derive any significant proposition.
Should politicians distort facts and employ fallacious reasoning to get elected?" It's fair to say that not everyone needs to go to college -- if we can produce the jobs that pay the salaries college once promised.
But in the face of such weighty, if fallacious, testimony to the contrary, who am I to persuade my elderly friend to ignore his gut when it comes to thinking about the national debt?
The point that I am trying to make is that a fallacious appeal to privilege does not get us anywhere as a society.
In summary, our natural ability to focus on what is perceived to be most important and make quick decisions by insight and intuition [2, 4, 13] makes human judgment highly effective, but it can also lead to fallacious reasoning due to cognitive and cultural biases.
It is tempting to see Fodor's concerns as resting on a fallacious argument to the effect that a process must be informationally encapsulated to be computationally tractable.
