Sentence examples for fallacies in the interpretation of from inspiring English sources

Another of Knight's important contributions to economics was his 1924 article "Fallacies in the Interpretation of Social Cost," in which he challenged A.C. Pigou's view that traffic congestion justified the taxation of roads.

The implications of the loss of specific antigenic material with reference to cell structure and function, and some fallacies in the interpretation of the significance of tissue specific antigen in carcinogenesis are discussed.

Groups 2 and 3 are called logical fallacies, or fallacies "in discourse," in contrast to the substantive, or material, fallacies of group 1, called fallacies "in matter"; and groups 1 and 2, in contrast to group 3, are called informal fallacies.

The fallacy is an error in the interpretation of such data and assumes that relationships found at the group level also hold at the individual level.

Although his most extensive and theoretically detailed discussion of fallacies is in the Sophistical Refutations, Aristotle also discusses fallacies in the Prior Analytics and On Rhetoric.

In contrast, an individualistic fallacy, 113 114 based on the 'high-risk' 111 approach, should also be avoided in the interpretation of these results.

A classical criticism of this approach is the 'ecological fallacy', corresponding to a logical fallacy in interpretation of the observed correlations at the population level, assuming that they can be applied at the individual level.

These were grouped data, and the possible effects of 'ecological fallacy' should also be firmly considered for the interpretation of the results [ 28].

He spoke of false idols (1620, aphorisms 40 44) saying that they have the same relation to the interpretation of nature that fallacies have to logic.

"The belief in a hard core of historical facts existing objectively and independently of the interpretation of the historian is a preposterous fallacy," he wrote, "but one which it is very hard to eradicate".

And although some apparently claim that fallacies are figments of a critic's imagination, they are really proposing to study fallacies in the context of meta-argumentation.