Exact(4)
The above reasoning justifies our choice of fairness solution for TCP over wireless multi-hop settings.
TCP-AP, another instance of the cross-layer method, attempts to eliminate the reliance of TCP fairness solution on feedback messages [18].
To propose an effective fairness solution for TCP over wireless multi-hop networks one has to consider the dynamic nature of the environment as an important design factor.
In the respect of the fairness among sources, since the optimal secrecy-rate fairness, which depends on the topology of the network, is not always achievable, here, we only derive the relationship between the NBS and the optimal power fairness solution.
Similar(56)
The existing literature on TCP fairness solutions over multi-hop wireless networks can be categorized into cross-layer designs e.g [12 21], and layered proposals, e.g., [22 34].
First, it does not use any feedback messages unlike the majority of the above fairness solutions which is crucial for saving the valuable bandwidth in WMN.
To minimize the inter-cell interference and achieve a fairness guaranteed solution among different users, a novel enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) technology is proposed by jointly considering about the cell range expansion (CRE) scheme to minimize interferences among multi-tier cellular networks, improving the network throughput and quality of service (QoS).
With α =1, the α-fairness optimal solution corresponds to the traditional proportional fair (PF) resource allocation satisfying the Nash's definition of fairness [43].
Even though the fairness-related solution concepts (e.g., the Shapley value) are studied well, the computational complexity makes it practically unable to implement in the realistic network operation model.
Finally, the existence, uniqueness, and fairness of their solution were proved [13].
Nash bargaining solution (NBS) fairness and proportional fairness (PF) are two suitable candidates for fairness consideration, and both can provide attractive trade-offs between total throughput and each user's capacity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com