Sentence examples for fairness right from inspiring English sources

The Court's due process jurisprudence was expanded with the 1948 decision in In re Oliver, which revised the breadth of the "fundamental fairness" right.

"While I'm devoted to research grappling with key ethical issues of fairness, rights & inclusion in AI, I don't believe this is the right forum for me to engage in this important work," he tweeted.

"While I'm devoted to research grappling with key ethical issues of fairness, rights and inclusion in AI, I don't believe this is the right forum for me to engage in this important work," Acquisti said on Twitter.

So, if you're going to embrace affirmative action, feminism, equal rights, economic fairness, civil rights, -- Jesus, even empathy -- you stand warned you will be attacked.

The two main elements of this conceptual framework being i) the rules of procedural fairness — the right to be heard and the right to an unbiased decision; and ii) the concepts that result and flow logically from these rules being those derived from the Terms of Reference and the Terms of Appointment.

She instilled in me a sense of fairness, of right and wrong and the confidence to do what I know is right.

Rather it means realigning their concepts of fairness and right and wrong with those of the rest of society.

The basic sense of fairness seems right, but it isn't that simple — "cheaters" is a strong word, since Major League Baseball did not begin testing players for performance enhancers until 2003, and didn't enact serious penalties until 2005.

He speaks of "fairness" and right and wrong, words designed to blunt the traditional charge by Democrats that across-the-board tax cutting gives huge windfalls to upper-income Americans.

The basic sense of fairness seems right, but it isn't that simple—"cheaters" is a strong word, since Major League Baseball did not begin testing players for performance enhancers until 2003, and didn't enact serious penalties until 2005.

"The reason for having extra tax rises is... because you want the burden to be fairly shared and the extra tax rises make sure the wealthy are making a contribution - those people do not consume so much public spending so you have to have tax to continue to get the fairness mix right".