fairness of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "fairness of" is grammatically correct and commonly used in written English.
It is typically used to describe the quality or characteristic of being fair or just. Example: "The fairness of the trial was called into question by the defense attorney, who argued that key evidence was not presented to the jury."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

And fairness of treatment too.

The Guardian

Please clarify the fairness of such requirements".

The Guardian

Such is the fairness of parents.

The New York Times - Travel

We appreciate the fairness of its viewpoint.

The New York Times

Concerns about the overall fairness of the elections were widespread.

The New York Times

Meanwhile, strong doubts persist about the fairness of democracy.

The Economist

The lawyers have also questioned the fairness of the proceeding.

The New York Times

They know the fairness of their actions will be evaluated.

The New York Times

It was ranked No. 188 in fairness of financing.

The New York Times

They questioned the wisdom and fairness of taxing the rich.

The New York Times - Health

We talk about the fairness of the punishments handed out.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing abstract concepts, use "fairness of" to ensure clarity and emphasize the specific aspect of justice or equity you are addressing. For instance, "the fairness of the process" is more precise than simply "the process is fair".

Common error

Avoid using "fairness of" when a simpler adjective suffices. Instead of "the fairness of the decision", consider "the decision's fairness" or "the decision was fair" for more concise writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "fairness of" primarily functions as a noun phrase acting as the subject or object of a sentence, often followed by a noun to specify what is being evaluated for fairness. Ludwig's AI indicates that it is grammatically correct and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

45%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "fairness of" is a grammatically correct and widely used expression for assessing the impartiality and justice of various situations. As Ludwig AI confirms, it’s suitable for formal and professional contexts, appearing frequently in news, scientific, and business domains. While versatile, writers should avoid redundancy by opting for simpler constructions when appropriate. When seeking alternatives, consider phrases like "justness of" or "equity of" to convey similar meanings with slightly different nuances. The phrase is frequently found in authoritative sources such as The New York Times and The Guardian, reinforcing its credibility and widespread acceptance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

justness of

Replaces "fairness" with a synonym, focusing on the quality of being just.

equity of

Emphasizes impartiality and equal treatment.

impartiality of

Highlights the lack of bias or prejudice.

objectivity of

Focuses on unbiased assessment and judgment.

righteousness of

Implies moral correctness and integrity.

legitimacy of

Focuses on whether something is lawful and ethically justifiable.

appropriateness of

Focuses on suitability and properness in a given context.

reasonableness of

Highlights logical and rational aspects.

integrity of

Focuses on moral soundness and completeness.

honesty of

Emphasizes truthfulness and absence of deceit.

FAQs

How can I use "fairness of" in a sentence?

The phrase "fairness of" is used to discuss the quality of being impartial and just. For example, "The investigation aimed to determine the "fairness of the trial"" or "Concerns were raised about the "fairness of the system"".

What are some synonyms for "fairness of"?

Alternatives to "fairness of" include phrases like "justness of", "equity of", or "impartiality of". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it always necessary to use "fairness of", or can I use a simpler construction?

While "fairness of" is grammatically correct, sometimes simpler constructions like "the trial's fairness" or "how fair the system is" may be more concise and direct, depending on the context.

What is the difference between "fairness of" and "equal of"?

"Fairness of" refers to impartiality and justice in treatment or outcomes, while "equal of" indicates that two things are identical or of the same value. They are not interchangeable.