Sentence examples for fair reproducibility from inspiring English sources

The modified sensor showcased high recognition selectivity, fair reproducibility and long term stability of signal response in the physiological environment.

The questions about moderate activity had fair reproducibility and correlated poorly with most comparison measures.

Interpretation of ICC was categorized according to Landis and Koch [ 20] as follows: <0, no reproducibility; 0.0 0.20, slight reproducibility; 0.21 0.40, fair reproducibility; 0.41 0.60, moderate reproducibility; 0.61 0.80, substantial reproducibility; and 0.81 1.00, almost perfect reproducibility.

For example, MRI has the advantage of revealing all components (inflammation, damage, and tophi) but probably has lower resolution and reproducibility for tophus measurement than CT scanning, whereas US can reveal all components except bone edema (and some deep tissue tophi), appears to have fair reproducibility for tophus measurement, but tends to be operator-dependent.

For example, the study conducted by Senat et al. [ 12] reported only fair reproducibility of nasal bone identification, categorizing the results as present/uncertain/absent, by retrospective assessment of video-loops of a 30-second duration among three experienced operators with good agreement of only 80.7%, and the best Kappa value of only about 0.4.

Several studies that examined variability in urinary concentrations over weeks to months reported generally low reproducibility for BPA (Braun et al. 2011, 2012; Mahalingaiah et al. 2008; Nepomnaschy et al. 2009; Teitelbaum et al. 2008) and fair reproducibility for other phenols and parabens (Meeker et al. 2011; Smith et al. 2012; Teitelbaum et al. 2008) among U.S. children and adults.

Two of the items were found to have fair or low reproducibility (K<0.41).

The ICC (3,1) was 0.656 and the ICC (1,1) 0.687 indicating fair to good reproducibility.

The dimension scores showed fair to good reproducibility (ICC ranging from 0.55 to 0.85).

And 5/29 laboratories presented poor, fair or moderate reproducibility in excise of quality control panel.

The ICC (3, 1) for these data was 0.698, indicating fair to good reproducibility.