Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
Scores, 0 – 10, poor level of knowledge; 11 – 20, fair level of knowledge; 21 – 30: good level of knowledge [ 9].
Generally, compared to other studies [ 6- 10] in China, the MSM in the study had a fair level of knowledge.
The respondents were young, of roughly equal gender (51.5% female), well educated, and had a fair level of knowledge on health services in the UK.
For participants who answered questions about HPV (on the basis that they had indicated that they had heard of HPV), three levels of knowledge were defined: a low level of knowledge (0 2 correct answers), a fair level of knowledge (3 4 correct answers) and an excellent level of knowledge (5 6 correct answers).
Analysis revealed that 35% (14/40) of women had a low level of knowledge (0 2 correct answers), 60% (24/40) had a fair level of knowledge (3 4 correct answers), and only 5% (2/40) had a high level of knowledge (5 6 correct answers).> -wrap-foot> *Only for the 40 women who have heard about HPV.
Most had a fair level of knowledge on HIV/AIDS, with the highest mean knowledge score among the MSM from Jiamusi, those with income 2000-3000 RMB/monthosehosearchinging sexual partners via internet and those performed HIV testing over 1 year ago).
Similar(53)
They were comparatively young, well educated, had a fair level of communication skills in English, and a good knowledge of their entitlements to health care.
This value represents a fair level of agreement and is significantly better than chance (κ=0.31; p<0.05).
In P2, the ICC scores showed a fair level of intrarater reliability, as the minimum reliability.
Only a fair level of agreement (κ = 0.40) was found for epileptic seizure presence.
University/college was reported as a primary source of knowledge by the majority (92 (53.2%)) of those who were aware of the partograph and almost all of these individuals had fair and good level of knowledge.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com