Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Similar(59)
An analysis of the failures of Method 1 is presented.
It is estimated that between 8 and 30 million pregnancies each year result from contraceptive failure either due to inconsistent or incorrect use of contraceptive methods or failure of the method itself [ 7].
Within the distance thresholds the main failures of methods tested by our study were: 1) individuals often travelled further than is tolerated by the thresholds prior to dispersal; and 2) the additional condition of a certain number of locations over this distance that had to be met before an individual was deemed to have dispersed was too small in all but method 7 and method 6.
A second patient developed a deep infection that required surgical cleaning and modification of the surgical method; this case was considered a failure of the method.
A third patient had pseudoarthrosis of the fracture of the distal radius that required other surgical procedures and changes in the treatment method (dorsal plate and iliac bone graft); this case was considered failure of the method.
Numerical methods are preferred for many of the complicated separation situations; however, the solution process in a numerical method is carried out through iterations and is very sensitive to initial values, which often leads to the failure of the method.
We demonstrate the failure of this method on the Hénon-Heiles problem.
The range of conditions for efficiency and failure of each method is discussed in detail.
Normalization of samples is very important in RT-PCR, and the efficiency of first-strand cDNA synthesis is one of the most important determinants in the success or failure of this method.
Indeed, the failure of one method (either GROUPER or RECON) to recover all the TEs would illustrate differences in the ability of these methods to take TE structural variations into account.
The failure of the method in Bushdid et al. (2014) occurs after the sphere-packing estimate.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com