Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
The experimental failure loads averaged approximately 115% of the theoretical failure loads.
The failure loads were compared with the assumed design loads.
Failure loads were predicted using the damage zone method (DZM).
The investigation focused on the ultimate load conditions and code-based equations were used to determine theoretical failure loads for comparison with the test failure loads.
Experimental failure loads were found to average 175% of the theoretically predicted values.
Also the experimental failure loads averaged 67% of the design shear strength of the reinforced sections.
Failure loads and load-shortening curves of lipped channel columns were investigated in this study.
The observed shear strengths are compared with predicted failure loads according to international code provisions.
The resultant behavior is sensitive to structural imperfections which may cause substantially reduced failure loads.
The failure loads, failure modes and weights of the tested panels are compared.
Bearing and failure loads of the joints were evaluated, and the dynamic failure mechanism was discussed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com