Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

failed to include

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "failed to include" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something was not incorporated or considered in a particular context or document. Example: "The report failed to include the latest financial data, which is crucial for our analysis."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Unfortunately, this work has failed to include a spatial parameter.

The statements had failed to include the original amount borrowed.

Basically, the statements failed to include the original amount borrowed.

About half of these failed to include a single Asian or Asian-American character, and one fifth failed to include a single black character.

Binary models failed to include published records for C. albus in Brazil.

Traditional assessments failed to include freshwater fish ecology in the general assessment framework.

Previous meta-analyses have failed to include all currently available randomized trials.

Have a perspective on the state of journalism that we somehow failed to include?

It was found that many people's loan statements failed to include the original amount borrowed.

The government's lead negotiator, Camilo Gómez, disputed assertions that the plan failed to include substantive measures.

News & Media

The New York Times

It had failed to include immigrants from various parts of the world.

News & Media

The New Yorker
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "failed to include", ensure the context clearly indicates what should have been included and why its omission is significant. This provides clarity and strengthens your argument.

Common error

Avoid using "failed to include" when the item in question was intentionally excluded for a valid reason. Ensure the omission was an oversight or error, not a deliberate choice.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "failed to include" functions as a verb phrase indicating an omission or a lack of incorporation. As Ludwig AI indicates, this phrase suggests that something was expected or required but was not present. It is frequently used to point out deficiencies or oversights in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

35%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "failed to include" is a common and grammatically correct verb phrase used to indicate an omission or lack of incorporation. Ludwig AI confirms its usability and correctness. It is most frequently found in news, scientific, and academic contexts, serving the purpose of critique or highlighting a deficiency. When employing this phrase, ensure the context clearly indicates what was expected and why its absence is significant, and avoid using it when the exclusion was intentional and justified.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "failed to include" in a sentence?

You can replace "failed to include" with phrases such as "omitted", "left out", or "did not incorporate" depending on the context.

What's the difference between "failed to include" and "forgot to include"?

"Failed to include" generally suggests a more formal oversight, while "forgot to include" implies a memory lapse. For example, a report "failed to include" data, but someone "forgot to include" a file attachment.

Is it better to say "did not include" or "failed to include"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct. "Failed to include" often carries a stronger connotation of expectation or requirement, whereas "did not include" is a more neutral statement of fact.

In what situations is it appropriate to use "failed to include"?

Use "failed to include" when something was expected or required to be present, but it was missing. For instance, "The study failed to include a control group", indicating a methodological flaw.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: