The phrase "failed to appropriately" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to describe a situation where someone did not act or respond in a suitable or correct manner. Example: The employee failed to appropriately handle the customer's complaint, causing further frustration and dissatisfaction.
The review found that IHMS had failed to appropriately conduct working with children checks but said "this was an ongoing issue that was never resolved".
But they have been underfinanced and undermanned; people involved will tell you that the State Department and the administration failed to appropriately support them.
The law does not specify what "evidence of a material violation" means, nor when a company executive has failed to "appropriately respond to the evidence," requiring the lawyer to go to a more senior executive or to the board.
"In my judgment, you have lost the confidence of the public of Gwent and your officers and staff; I find your managerial style to be unacceptably dismissive, abrupt and unhelpful; you have failed to appropriately manage external and internal relations; you are deeply hostile to the very concept of the office of the PCC.
Australia's immigration department failed to appropriately oversee the multinational that provides healthcare for asylum seekers and was unable to cope with the "commercially aggressive practices" that led to numerous failures to meet medical benchmarks, a series of damning internal reviews have found.
Many, including Sports Illustrated's Lee Jenkins, have argued that Stern, and the NBA in general, have not only failed to appropriately rein in Sterling, but have essentially rewarded him: Sterling was a racist before the Paul trade, and he'd have remained one regardless, but the NBA validated him.
"These charges illustrate the pitfalls that exist for companies that fail to appropriately monitor potential risks in their global operations".
In a statement, Warner Music said it "simply cannot accept terms that fail to appropriately and fairly compensate recording artists, songwriters, labels and publishers for the value they provide".
The final video stars a sloth named David, who fails to appropriately respond to an anecdote concerning a teenage girl's abhorrence of people who wear socks with sandals.
In December, Warner Music Group removed its music videos from YouTube saying it "simply cannot accept terms that fail to appropriately and fairly compensate recording artists, songwriters, labels and publishers for the value they provide".
"This is an unacceptable outcome from the nation's primary enforcer of securities laws, and it is the latest example of an SEC action that fails to appropriately punish guilty parties, deter future wrongdoings and protect investors".
