failed because of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "failed because of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to explain the reason for a failure in various contexts, such as projects, plans, or personal endeavors. Example: "The project failed because of a lack of funding and support from management."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

It failed because of cowardice.

The New Yorker

That failed because of Democratic opposition.

The New York Times

It failed because of U.N. and U.S. blundering".

The New York Times

Thirdly it failed because of continuing economic integration.

The Guardian

Previous attempts at talks have failed because of walkouts.

The New York Times

Hard power failed because of a lack of soft power.

The Guardian

Prosecutors said that the Chinese ventures failed because of political interference.

The New York Times

Her reforms, experts believe, largely failed because of opposition from powerful landowners, including her relatives.

The New York Times

Both failed because of political interference and a collapse in the price of conventional energy.

The Economist

"He always failed because of an innate goodness which surely nauseated him".

The New York Times - Books

"The B.S.P. failed because of mis-governance and disconnect with the people.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "failed because of", ensure the reason provided is specific and directly related to the failure. Avoid vague or generalized explanations.

Common error

While "failed because of" is acceptable, overuse can make your writing sound repetitive. Vary your sentence structure by using alternatives like "due to" or "as a result of" to enhance readability.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "failed because of" functions as a causal connector, linking an event or action that resulted in failure with the reason or cause for that failure. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and widely used to explain the reasons for setbacks.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

33%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "failed because of" is a grammatically sound and very common expression used to explain the reasons behind a failure. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread use across various domains. Its frequency is notable in news and media, science, and encyclopedic contexts. For alternative phrasing, consider options like "failed due to" or "failed as a result of", depending on the desired level of formality. When using the phrase, clarity and specificity are crucial to effectively convey the cause of the failure.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

failed due to

Replaces "because of" with "due to", offering a slightly more formal tone while retaining the same meaning.

failed as a result of

Substitutes "because of" with "as a result of", providing a more emphatic and descriptive causal link.

was unsuccessful because of

Adds "was unsuccessful" to the sentence, emphasizing the failure while maintaining the causal connection.

failed on account of

Uses "on account of" in place of "because of", which is a more formal and somewhat archaic alternative.

failed owing to

Replaces "because of" with "owing to", presenting a formal and slightly less common causal expression.

foundered due to

Replaces "failed" with "foundered", indicating a more significant and often irreversible failure.

collapsed as a consequence of

Replaces "failed" with "collapsed" and "because of" with "as a consequence of", suggesting a complete and often sudden failure.

met its demise due to

Employs a more dramatic expression, "met its demise", indicating a final and conclusive failure.

fell short on account of

Uses "fell short" to indicate failure and "on account of" to express the reason, providing a more nuanced description.

was defeated by

Replaces "failed because of" with "was defeated by", indicating an external force or factor causing the failure.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "failed because of" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, you can use alternatives such as "failed due to", "failed as a result of", or "failed owing to". These options often add a layer of sophistication to your writing.

Is it grammatically correct to say "failed because of"?

Yes, "failed because of" is grammatically correct and commonly used. However, it's essential to ensure the reason you provide after the phrase is clear and directly relevant to the failure.

What are some common reasons things "failed because of"?

Common reasons include lack of funding, poor planning, technical difficulties, or inadequate support. The specific reason depends heavily on the context of the failure.

Which is better, "failed because of" or "failed due to"?

Both "failed because of" and "failed due to" are acceptable. "Failed due to" is often considered slightly more formal, but the choice depends on the overall tone and style of your writing.