Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
All open-ended responses to the recognition question were initially put into one of 15 sub-categories and then those initial 15 sub-categories were subsequently classified into a final set of three categories: 1) Factually Correct TSS Details; 2) Myth (i.e., factually incorrect) TSS Details; and, No TSS Details.
Rohde wrote a three-part story for the New York Times, as well as a book with his wife titled A Rope and a Prayer, about his kidnapping, but he is careful to mention that although the book is factually correct, he deliberately did not provide all the details.
Rohde wrote a three-part story for the New York Times, as well as a book with his wife titled A Rope and a Prayer, about his kidnapping, but he is careful to mention that although the book is factually correct, he deliberately did not provide all the details.
This score was also given to factually correct answers which were poor in reasoning and/or lacked any detail or elaboration.
Party Y's charges of bias thus find firmer footing: On this point, at least, Party Y is factually correct.
It is factually correct.
Is this factually correct?
Both will be factually correct.
CVs also need to be factually correct.
It was to be factually correct but dramatically written.
5. Are all of your points factually correct and supportable?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com