Sentence examples for factual justification from inspiring English sources

Incredible as it may seem, these people have been imprisoned on the average for almost a year, and more than 1,500 have been held for more than three years, without any established legal or factual justification.

As we reported in today's New York Times, the state sent the city a letter yesterday demanding specific legal and factual justification for why Mayor James and the Municipal Council created two off-budget funds for the assignment of $80 million in public money to projects chosen by a board that includes the mayor and his allies.

However, a substantial dissent by one judge pointed out that many of the FCC's justifications for its rules, such as that banning paid prioritization would encourage that "virtuous cycle" the agency is so fond of mentioning, had no factual justification.

It led to the immediate erosion of the post-Church Committee Attorney General (AG) Guidelines that required varying levels of factual justification before targeting any domestic group.

However, some reasonable level of factual justification should be required before the FBI or other federal law enforcement agency can target a group or individual.

"Portugal is... not only completely on course but even ahead of the curve, so there really is no factual justification for such an assessment at this early point," he said.

"After conducting an internal investigation, the government released little information about the circumstances surrounding the raid, the legal or factual justifications for it, and its consequences," the suit states.

The factual claims on which this type of justification rests might be disputed.

You shouldn't need a motivation or justification to correct spelling or factual errors on Wikipedia -- a certain desire for orderliness, good grammar, or truth should be sufficient.

If there is a dispute about a drone strike's justification, he said, the administration should release the factual record, showing why the threat was imminent and real, and explaining why the government of the affected country either consented to the strike or was unable to carry it out on its own.

That history was at least arguably relevant, because the factual dispute within the court centered on whether Congress had sufficient justification for opening the states to suit under the Americans With Disabilities Act.