factual errors of

USAGE SUMMARY

The part of the sentence "factual errors of" is correct and usable in written English.
You could use this phrase to refer to mistakes in a factual statement or a claim. For example, "Her blog post was full of factual errors of current events."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

To clear the palate, the host pivoted to a segment — the chyron read "Gun Grabbers Ignorant About Firearms" — that exemplified what NRATV hosts do best: scoffing at the factual errors of politicians and pundits.

The New Yorker

As one of a handful of surviving witnesses, I was pedantically irritated by factual errors of no concern to anyone who wasn't there, and disappointed by the bland clichés in the dialogue.

The Guardian - Film

There were also 16 complaints about factual errors, of which 11 were fixed and five were carried over for a variety of reasons; and five complaints of bias in other stories, including two involving our coverage of Bernie Sanders, who is fighting for the US Democratic presidential nomination.

The Guardian - Opinion

That version of the post, which contained linguistic and factual errors of its own — like calling the Gregorian calendar the "Georgian calendar," also reported as if it were a matter of fact that the Syrian rebels "are expected to re-coordinate in Turkish territory where they have set up secret bases under the close supervision with the Turkish government and the Israeli intelligence service".

The New York Times

The factual errors of this study caused Filitti great distress, to the point where he planned to entirely revise his version of the Cantacuzino family tree.

Wikipedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

If people were to adopt a similar tactic when complaining about the Sun's catalogue of factual errors on any given week its office would be overflowing with toilet rolls.

The Guardian

Awkward silences, microphone troubles, factual errors on slides, the dribbling of water on shirtfronts, stumbles onstage — all such infelicities are elided.

The New Yorker

Jean Schulz said that she had found factual errors, many of them trivial, like whether a Redwood tree was dug up, but that "it just makes me wonder about other things in the book".

The New York Times - Books

Should Taxpayers Back It?" Stross attacks Tesla for requesting government loans along with the rest of the car industry, saying "Can you conceive any way that federal dollars could be put at greater risk — and for no equity in return, keep in mind — to benefit fewer people?" The article had significant factual errors, most of which were called out by Jason Calacanis and myself.

TechCrunch

The 10 factual errors were of several types.

Database : the journal of biological databases and curation

Ginsberg sent a long list of what he said were factual errors or examples of bias in the first of the two Times articles, which focused primarily on Murdoch's activities in the United States.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing "factual errors of", always specify the source or context where these errors occur to provide clarity and avoid generalizations.

Common error

Avoid assuming that all inaccuracies are intentional or malicious. "Factual errors of" ten stem from misunderstandings, outdated information, or simple oversights.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "factual errors of" primarily functions as a noun phrase, specifying the type of mistakes associated with something. It is used to describe inaccuracies that pertain to factual information, as demonstrated by Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Wiki

20%

Science

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "factual errors of" is a noun phrase used to identify and categorize inaccuracies related to facts. Ludwig AI confirms that it is grammatically correct and usable in written English. While relatively uncommon, as revealed by Ludwig, its usage is consistent across news, wiki, and scientific contexts, reflecting a neutral register. When using this phrase, clarity is key; specify the source of the errors to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "inaccuracies of" or "mistakes in" can provide similar meanings in varying contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

inaccuracies of

Focuses on the lack of accuracy rather than the presence of errors.

mistakes in

A more general term, referring to any kind of mistake, not just factual ones.

falsehoods in

Emphasizes the untruthfulness of the information.

misstatements in

Highlights the act of making incorrect statements.

untruths in

Similar to 'falsehoods' but can also refer to deliberately deceptive statements.

errors within

Implies a broader range of errors beyond just factual ones.

flaws in

Points to deficiencies or imperfections, which may include factual inaccuracies.

fallacies in

Indicates logical flaws or misleading arguments, which can stem from factual errors.

misrepresentations of

Highlights the distorted presentation of facts.

distortions of

Focuses on the twisting or altering of facts.

FAQs

How can I identify "factual errors of" a statement?

To identify "factual errors of" a statement, cross-reference the information with reliable sources, check for consistency in data, and be aware of potential biases. Always consult multiple sources to verify claims.

What's the difference between "factual errors of" and "misconceptions of"?

"Factual errors of" refer to incorrect statements that can be proven wrong with evidence, while "misconceptions of" are inaccurate understandings or beliefs, often based on a lack of knowledge or flawed reasoning.

What are some consequences of ignoring "factual errors of" information?

Ignoring "factual errors of" information can lead to poor decision-making, spread of misinformation, damage to credibility, and potential legal repercussions depending on the context.

Which sources are most reliable for minimizing "factual errors of" information?

Reputable academic journals, government reports, established news organizations, and encyclopedias are generally reliable sources for minimizing "factual errors of" information. Always check for bias and cross-reference information.