We note that this prediction also holds if photosynthesis (and λ) increases by a factor of either 1.5 or 2 under the switch to higher irradiance, rather than by a factor of 1.75 (see Text S1).
We generated scaffold data sets with a scaffold factor of either 0.20, 0.5, 0.75 or 1.0, for either one, two or four universal genes.
The sMer and sTyro3 ELISAs were not influenced by the presence of autoantibodies such as rheumatoid factor of either IgG, IgM, or IgA class.
Each gene is a collection of characteristics: the type of the encoded protein (a pump, an enzyme of either of the two types, or a transcription factor of either of the two types), the promoter strength, the operator type, and several numerical constants which describe the encoded protein.
Each of these studies have however described the influence of such factors on either single features of facial skin e.g. skin wrinkling or on a composite model derived from a number of individual features [9].
With so many factors on either side of the environment ledger, crunching the numbers to determine whether our connected lives are good or bad for the environment is no mean feat.
To identify factors predictive of either lateral or prone infant sleep positioning.
However, given that there has been little examination of the factor structure of either measure, we did not have specific hypotheses about the content of specific subscales or which subscale would be more associated with which criteria.
