There is currently no possibility to reuse captured routine data in electronic study documentation systems and therefore the advantages of HIS based documentation are limited.
Registry based documentation systems such as GTDS or other center focused cancer documentation systems rarely support guidelines or workflows and demand extra documentation activities outside the regular hospital CIS for cancer cases, which limits their usability [ 16, 31, 52, 53].
That changed when the prevailing ideal became fact-based documentation without preconception.
The median assessment score we used was an index based on documentation of core clinical signs and symptoms, it had a range from 0 (documentation completely absent) to 28 (perfect documentation).
Grouping the different causes of faults was based on documentation.
Patient cohorts were compared based on documentation of delirium and antipsychotic exposure.
In addition 806 cases were completed retrospectively in order to have the entire follow-up documentation electronically available showing the need for HIS based follow-up documentation.
Damn fact-based reporting.
In fact it is based in Pittsburgh.
But I assumed, based on the documentation, that they were all legitimate companies".
