Sentence examples for facility proportion from inspiring English sources

Amount of cultivated land, irrigation facility (proportion of the total amount cultivated land with irrigation facility) and organic manure have a positive linkage with crop yield (Azam et al. 2012), so these variables were assumed to have a positive impact on the marketing indicators.

For instance, illiteracy level, polygamous marriage, early marriage (teenage pregnancy), poor utilization of modern health facility, proportion of rural residence and poverty are predominantly higher in the north than the south [ 2, 4, 8].

Access to improved water source and sanitary facility, proportion of children who completed vaccination, and proportion of children who received deworming tablets in the preceding 6 months of the survey, were also similar.

Indicators for emergency obstetric care include measures of availability, geographical distribution of facilities, proportion of births in emergency facilities, ability to treat women with complications, caesarean sections and direct obstetric case fatality rate.

Policy simulations suggested that if these attributes were improved at existing facilities, the proportion of women preferring facility delivery would rise from 43%to88%8% [ 29].

The costs for hospice service were calculated as weighted average with costs by the types of hospice facility and proportion of use.

Amongst mothers with no education, only 15 per cent give birth in a health facility – a proportion that increases through the levels of education to 71 per cent of mothers with secondary or higher level education.

In the following surveys, the exact same facilities were included, and 15 facilities were selected in Shahrinav and Tursunzade districts, respectively 6 and 9 facilities, in proportion with the number of facilities in each district and following the same criteria of balanced remote and more accessible areas.

About one-third of all urban residences have access to safe drinking water, electricity as their main source of lighting, and indoor toilet facilities; the proportion of houses with those facilities in the rural areas is far smaller.

Although our findings show that eligible children are on average less likely to incur any out-of-pocket health expenditure in public facilities, a proportion of eligible children still do at levels comparable to non-eligible children.

Within the 140 VHA facilities, the proportion of patients who received MOVE!® treatment ranged from 0.05% to 16% (mean = 4.4%).