Suggestions(1)
Exact(4)
Scores on the facial scale are transported to a daily 0-3 score.
Pain intensity is scored using an affective facial scale with faces ranging from showing no pain at all (face A) to the most severe pain (face I).
To help children's comprehension of the severity of the impact, a facial scale with three different expressions was added to the arrows presented in the original version of the Child-OIDP.
They varied from broader issues, such as the use of pictures and examples in answering options (pictures of a facial scale were used for all children to help them decide on the severity of an impact), to very detailed modifications, such as the choice of the appropriate marking symbol.
Similar(55)
Concurrent validity was supported by moderate (r = 0.32) to strong (r = 0.70) correlations between the Facial Affective Scale and ERC items and scale scores.
The measurement scales for assessing line severity and improvement in line severity used the same scoring as the Facial Wrinkle Scale and subject's global assessment of change in wrinkle appearance as the United States pivotal trials [ 3, 4].
Multiple ranking was used to determine preference and perception of sourness, and a 5-point facial rating scale was used to assess liking and wanting.
Before the MRI procedure, the children were asked to indicate how they felt using the Facial Image Scale (FIS) [ 1 ].
We developed an algorithm that simulates and improves the clinical assessment performed by the expert panel, determining a person's perceived age with the Carruthers validated facial grading scale based on individual phenotype criteria.
Indeed, 77% of patients and 87% of physicians reported onset of effect by day 2, although this subjective estimate of response was not correlated on the facial wrinkle scale.
Eligible patients were men and women aged ≥ 18 years with glabellar frown lines rated by the investigator as mild, moderate, severe, or very severe (grades 1 4) on the Merz 5-point facial wrinkle scale at maximum frown.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com