Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(8)
As a result, the PL polarization properties (TE and TM modes) from cleaved facet surfaces are different for the (110) and ( 1 1 ¯ 0 ) facets.
Comparisons between the properties of the inferior and superior facet surfaces, as well as among spinal levels were performed within each species.
When considering the optical anisotropy from cleaved facet surfaces [ ( 1 1 ¯ 0 ) and (110) planes] of QR samples, the degree of polarization can be defined by DOP ( hkl ) = TE ⊥ - z − TM ∥ - z TE ⊥ - z + TM ∥ - z, (2).
Our experimental findings suggest that the PL polarization properties (intensity of TE versus TM mode) from cleaved facet surfaces should be different for the (110) and ( 1 1 ̄ 0 ) facets.
Although a significant difference in the magnitude of the anteroposterior curvature of the superior articular facet surfaces of the atlas between young children and adults has been observed, quantitative analysis of the curvature of these surfaces has not been documented.
Reference is made in the literature to the inherent instability of the atlantooccipital joint in infants and young children because of pliant ligaments, undeveloped musculature, smaller condyles, and the relative lack of anteroposterior curvature of the superior articular facet surfaces of the atlas.
Similar(52)
This difference might be due to the difference in the side facet surface.
Threading dislocations on the {111} plane are a result of the planes' lower facet surface energy [13, 14].
We conclude that a high ratio of the defect with the (002) facet surface produce a substantial increase in the oxidation of 2-ATP.
The {110} plane is the most favorable plane for the Au atom deposition because {110} has the highest facet surface energy.
The crystallographic orientation dependence of corrosion seen initially upon exposure in the buffered neutral pH environments corresponded with crystal facet surface energy for bare Mg but this trend disappeared with exposure time and Mg(OH 2 films were then detected.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com