Sentence examples for extremely large effects from inspiring English sources
The threshold values for assessing the magnitude of small, moderate, large, very large, and extremely large effects were 0.2, 0.6, 1.2, 2.0, and 4.0 of the between-subject standard deviation [29].
However, applying such a correction means that only interactions with extremely large effects could be detected.
Note that in the models containing both glycemia groups, we did not test for interactions between the glycemia intervention and HA because such a test of interaction would only have good power to detect extremely large effects.
A meta-analysis of 7 RCTs of EFT for PTSD found an extremely large effect as a result of EFT treatment (Sebastian & Nelms, 2016).
This is an extremely large effect size especially for a common marker (rs133885 MAF = 45%) and was most likely an overestimation of any potential genuine associations.
Specifically, the detection of an ecotypic QTL for vegetative phase change (last juvenile node) of extremely large effect occurring adjacent to EgrMIR156.5 implicates this locus as a positional candidate.
Local expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL; genetic loci influencing gene expression) with extremely large effect were used to form a classifier to predict an individual's eQTL genotype based on expression data alone.
There was a very large effect on empowerment when three studies were combined (SMD = -1.44, -2.79 to -0.09), but the evidence was very low-graded and heterogeneity was considerable (I = 99%; Chi = 186.26, p < 0.00001); one study reported an extremely large effect [ 49] whilst the others reported no difference.
If it is assumed that acupuncture produces an extremely large effect, as reported by Vickers, and that patients in the wait-list control will not improve (Badger), one would conclude that acupuncture has a large effect upon relieving cancer-related fatigue (Cohen's D = 1.02).
There were large-extremely large effects on running economy (VO2) at each speed and between all BWS for men (p ≤ 0.001) and moderate-large effects for women (p < 0.001).
However, given that both these positions are flanked by the same markers (OARCP26 and OARHH35), and that both QTL have extremely large estimated effects (~ ± 2.8 SD), it is unlikely that these are real QTL.
